Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AConnecticutYankee
What if? Sure. And Vidal's Lincoln does plenty of that, but within established framework. Jim Crace's Quarantine plays with what if describing Jesus' 40 days in the desert. Dystopias, such as 1984 do it as well. And then there is THE PLOT AGAINST AMERICA by Philip Roth in which "What if, he asks, the flying ace Charles A. Lindbergh had defeated Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 1940 election, and what if Lindbergh (who in real life articulated anti-Semitic sentiments and isolationist politics) had instituted a pro-Nazi agenda?" (source NYT.)

Peter Shaffer's play Amadeus and its film adaptation by Milos Forman were similar exercises which played with ideas based on limited historical knowledge. If you had been there, in Mozart's time, you'd know they got it all wrong, but none of us had.

Fiction, even fiction that "plays with ideas" starts out by observing history and then filling in the author's ideas. But twisting historical events and the nature of organizations that are still with us? Opus Dei a buncha murderous thugs? No thanks, Danny boy.

Those are interesting questions outside of this discussion and they're covered in a thin book by Umberto Eco Six Walks in Fictional Woods, which is a collection of his university lectures, I think. Highly recommended.

157 posted on 05/19/2006 1:25:15 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: Revolting cat!
Those are interesting questions outside of this discussion and they're covered in a thin book by Umberto Eco Six Walks in Fictional Woods, which is a collection of his university lectures, I think. Highly recommended.

Interesting Cat. I like Eco and I may look for that collection. Thanks.

And you make a good point about Amadeus. (Almost makes me question my opinion on these issues : ) .

If you mean that if the author twists the facts too far the novel will not be believable and therefore not readable, I agree. If you mean it's improper or unethical for the author to do that, I disagree. I mean, an author could write a book about Abraham Lincoln's experiences in World War II right? Why not? Go right ahead. Of course, it's doubtful whether anybody would be interested in reading it.

168 posted on 05/19/2006 1:49:49 PM PDT by AConnecticutYankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson