Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

City of Manila bans "[The] Da Vinci Code"
Philippine Daily Inquirer ^ | May 19, 2006 | Tina G. Santos

Posted on 05/19/2006 9:24:58 AM PDT by Ebenezer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
So now I know Tom Hanks is another one of those Hollywood faith-deficient twits. So much for his generally good-guy image.
1 posted on 05/19/2006 9:25:02 AM PDT by Ebenezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rrstar96
So now I know Tom Hanks is another one of those Hollywood faith-deficient twits.

So are the millions upon millions who bought the novel then.
2 posted on 05/19/2006 9:26:45 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
So now I know Tom Hanks is another one of those Hollywood faith-deficient twits.

So are the millions upon millions who bought the novel then.

You said it.

3 posted on 05/19/2006 9:29:03 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I prayerfully hope the Catholic Church realizes how deficient religious education and catechesis have been post-Vatican II, especially in the United States. That many otherwise-observant Catholics might buy the arguments and "facts" presented in "The Da Vinci Code" is appalling.


4 posted on 05/19/2006 9:31:18 AM PDT by Ebenezer (Strength and Honor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96
The movie suggests that Jesus Christ was married to Mary Magdalene and fathered a child. One reporter asked the cast if they believed Christ was married.

Star Tom Hanks quipped, "Well, I wasn't around." With reports from Nikko Dizon and Associated Press

But he can star in a film that makes that assertion. What a dumb answer.

5 posted on 05/19/2006 9:31:46 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96
Manila is just trying to keep the status of its city above the sewer pits of the world - NYC, Hollyweird, etc.

Just trying to keep cr@p away from innocent minds.

Or is the Da Vinci Code a comedy?

When the critics gathered in Cannes for a special showing, the place broke out in laughter at the most dramatic scene of the movie! Well, maybe they realized how bad it was at that point, and laughed with nervous excitement...

6 posted on 05/19/2006 9:32:10 AM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96

THE

CLINTON

CODE

If you thought The DaVinci Code was shocking, you ain't heard nothing yet.  Everything the media taught you about the Clinton's is wrong.  The Clinton Code reveals that Bill did not rape Juanita Broaddrick, did not sexually harass Katherine Willey, and did not have improper relations with Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers or even Monica Lewinski.  These were all a big cover up for Bill's real passion.....12-year old boys.

The Clinton Code takes you inside the secret society, the Sid Blums, a society dedicated to protecting the dark secrets of socialism and communism.  How the secret blood line of Marx, Lennin, and even Hitler all lead to a little girl named Hillary Rodham.  How the secret rituals of the Sid Blums concerning the shoes of Hillary Rodham lead to the firing of Dick Morris and to Dick's new role in infatuating the other side by giving bad advice and making predictions that never come true.  Also the book reveals the story behind the mysterious death of Vince Foster, and how the Clinton Body Count actually grossly underestimates the carnage left behind by the Clintons.

DISCLAIMER:  This book is not anti-anything. The Clinton Code is a novel and therefore a work of fiction. The artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals depicted in this novel all exist.  This disclaimer takes no stance about the theories discussed in this book.  This book serves only to open up discussion on these important topics.  In fact, I am a supporter of the Clintons.  If you ask what a Clinton supporter is, everyone will give you different answers.  To some to be a Clinton supporter, you must have voted for them.  To others, liking them is all it takes.  I prefer not to rigidly classify this personal concept, so to me being a Clinton supporter simply means to seek the truth out about these SOBs.

7 posted on 05/19/2006 9:34:22 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Is there a chapter on why radical feminism looked the other way while Bubba raped, molested, harassed and sodomized women?


8 posted on 05/19/2006 9:38:02 AM PDT by groanup (Shred For Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Is there a chapter on why radical feminism looked the other way while Bubba raped, molested, harassed and sodomized women?

As long as abortion remain legal, who cares what sick perverted method the king uses to sexually gratify himself?

9 posted on 05/19/2006 9:42:00 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96

What does Vatican II have to do with that?


10 posted on 05/19/2006 9:42:41 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I'd say your assertion is correct.

I am Catholic and I had friends who said I should read the book because it would "help me question my faith." Really? I responded with this remark: "If I knew of a book that I thought would help you question the love you have for your son, would you read it?" Silence.

Yeah, I know, the book is fiction. However, there are many, many people in America who love a conspiracy - and possess no religious faith.

Nothing like a good conspiracy to keep you warm at night - when your faith does not.

See yah. -Rex


11 posted on 05/19/2006 9:50:47 AM PDT by RexBeach ("There is no substitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96
In terms of Catechism, it still should be told from the pulpits (for those at least go to Sunday mass).

If one has a half-decent education on the faith, they might remember that Jesus said that it is better to put a yoke on your neck and be thrown into the sea than to bring [scandal to the innocent].

Basically, for Jesus to sin, would have been a great scandal, and by Jesus' own words, He should have killed himself by being drowned in the sea rather than commit an act of scandal...

The whole premise of the movie is that Jesus committed sin and scandal. But if Jesus was the man-God, how could that happen.

The exact quote I am using is from Matthew 18:5-10 (it is also found in the Gospel of Mark):

Matt 18:5-10 5 "And whoever welcomes a little child like this in my name welcomes me.

6 But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.

7 "Woe to the world because of the things that cause people to sin! Such things must come, but woe to the man through whom they come!

8 If your hand or your foot causes you to sin cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to enter life maimed or crippled than to have two hands or two feet and be thrown into eternal fire.

9 And if your eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to enter life with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into the fire of hell.

10 "See that you do not look down on one of these little ones. For I tell you that their angels in heaven always see the face of my Father in heaven.

(NIV)

The movie is a direct affront to this passage of the Gospel, as well as the words Jesus said: "Before Moses, I AM!" -- which where the phrase comes that Jesus is the Great I am.

People should be taught such things from the pulpit - Catholic or Christian, and what these words really mean...

12 posted on 05/19/2006 9:51:14 AM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: twigs

Vatican II itself is not to be blamed for the poor state of catechesis and the doctrinal illiteracy that has prompted gullible Catholics to buy "The Da Vinci Code" as factual. But it can be argued that, in misinterpreting the Council and in the name of "modernization", the teaching of Catholic doctrine in schools and churches was watered down.


13 posted on 05/19/2006 9:57:01 AM PDT by Ebenezer (Strength and Honor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
Conspiracy theories are mainstray of postmodern fiction (especially Thomas Pynchon) if the eternal verities are tenuous and discredited then something else much more mysterious just has to be holding the world together. One epistemology falls and another takes its place.
14 posted on 05/19/2006 9:57:26 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96

It sure is nice not to live in a country where some beurocrat can decide what movie I get to see.


15 posted on 05/19/2006 10:22:20 AM PDT by Bones75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

I am Catholic and I had friends who said I should read the book because it would "help me question my faith." Really? I responded with this remark: "If I knew of a book that I thought would help you question the love you have for your son, would you read it?" Silence. "

The answer from your friend would be: W"ell, no book would do that." Likewise, your answer to the original statement made by your friend could have been the same.


16 posted on 05/19/2006 10:24:37 AM PDT by Bones75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: topher

Matthew was always my favorite.


17 posted on 05/19/2006 10:27:28 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Governor of California, another job Americans won't do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
The Clinton Code is a novel and therefore a work of fiction.

But it's based on fact. The part about Bubba's passion for little boys is true.

18 posted on 05/19/2006 10:42:11 AM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rrstar96
According to Valeriano, cinema owners in Manila who defy the ban face a one-year jail term and a P5,000 fine. Those caught selling pirated DVDs or VCDs of the movie could be jailed for up to six months and fined P3,000, he added. P5000 = $100 US Dollars, P3000 = $60 US Dollars. Not a lot of teeth in that fine.
19 posted on 05/19/2006 10:53:12 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twigs
Vatican II has nothing to do with the premise of the Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown. Vatican II can be billed as "The Floodgates", which allowed thousands of homosexuals and social miscreants to enter the priesthood without fear. They have been caught, they have been shielded, they have brought the Roman Catholic Church to the very brink. Pope John Paul II thought that this was necessary to cleanse the American Roman Catholic Church, and so he sat silent while homosexual pedophiles, hiding behind Roman collars, were brought into courts in chains. He cleared the way for Pope Benedict XV to bring the entire flock around the world back into the true Roman Catholic faith. As I believe it to be, the one true faith.

The systematic murder of the Word of God, starting with the Roman Catholic Church, is the most integral part of the homosex agenda. If there is no one left to judge what is right or wrong, they are home free. Think Gay Gene Robinson in his Golden Robes, not in a church, but on the cover of Time magazine. Judgmental is a four letter word in today's American society. That doesn't make it right, or true, or good for anyone.

Think Gollum. LOTR is about America 2006, and what is "Precious"? Could it possibly be that "Precious" is simply, The Golden Rule? That "Precious" is most simply goodness in the ordinary human being? Bilbo Baggins is Everyman and goodness is the pathway to God, but how many take that path?
I would venture that the "born agains" understand more of my post than those who have never been truly tested.

The Word of Jesus Christ is more important than ever, and it is under attack by the many forces of evil, those that call themselves secular or "separation of church and state". The ACLU, CAIR, Code Pink, ANSWER are all Gollum, too. They think the secret is gold...true followers of Christ know that the answer is goodness.
20 posted on 05/19/2006 11:05:52 AM PDT by ishabibble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson