Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: streeeetwise
The bigger question is whether a pathetic whore of an expert hired by Nigong will be allowed to speculate about whether the photos are authentic.

There is no question - count on it. And the problem will be that neither the judge or jury will know that he's "a pathetic whore of an expert". He'll look and sound just as credible as the actual expert hired by the defense who is trying to prove a negative - the photos weren't altered.
761 posted on 05/22/2006 7:26:08 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 759 | View Replies ]


To: Locomotive Breath

That is where the integrity of the Judge would come in. The Judge is the gatekeeper on expert testimony, subject to judicial review. An expert has to have experience and build upon peer reviewed science or expertise. So, a retired FBI agent who had examined thousands of digital photos is an expert. A Durham detective who bought his first camera phone last year is not. While I am apalled by Nifong, I am not ready to conclude that every person of authority in Durham is without standards.


763 posted on 05/22/2006 7:53:59 AM PDT by streeeetwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 761 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson