Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sacajaweau; Ken H; OrinocoJack; All

I finally found these photos showing the details of the 12:41 am photo. Whether or not Nifong is still thinking that this photo time has been tampered with I do not know, but he told Time that they were going to argue that this one actually showed her arriving and if they discredit this photo they discredit all of the photos. Now Dan Abrams said that the prosecutors got the photo from NBC17 and he may have only seen this image.

The crucial photo was taken, defense sources say, at approximately 12:41 a.m., and shows the accuser calmly being helped into a car to leave the party. Taken together with other time-stamped photos from earlier in the evening, it is crucial to the defense argument that there was not enough time that night for a rape to occur. In fact, prosecutors will argue, that photo actually shows the accuser being dropped off at the party, not leaving it, and that it was taken well before midnight. In that photo, the accuser is shown in a black or dark-colored car, which matches a description of the car defense and prosecution sources say dropped her off at the party. The person in the driver seat of that car allegedly is not Kim Roberts, whom prosecutors will argue drove the accuser away from the party after the alleged rape. Time Magazine Wednesday, Apr. 26, 2006
this image shows CGM barefoot and blood on ankle
CGM apparently being helped into the car showing her bare right foot.
Shows driver, looks like Kim, shows bra strip....not a male.
I'm not really not sure if this is still as important as it was last month, but it really shows where the prosecutors are in this case, and wouldn't be really ironic if Nifong arrogant laughing about the time-line alibi was because he really thinks he can discredit this photo?

639 posted on 05/21/2006 12:11:26 PM PDT by za_claws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies ]


To: za_claws

I think people thinking they can discredit digital photos have no concept of metadata. Here's an example of the data embedded in each image file:

EquipMake Canon
EquipModel Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT
Orientation 1
XResolution 72
YResolution 72
ResolutionUnit 2
DateTime 2005:12:08 14:45:36
YCbCrPositioning 2
ExifExposureTime 0.001
ExifFNumber 14
ExifExposureProg 2
ExifISOSpeed 200
ExifDTOrig 2005:12:08 14:45:36
ExifDTDigitized 2005:12:08 14:45:36
ExifShutterSpeed 9.96578979492188
ExifAperture 7.61471557617188
ExifExposureBias 0
ExifMeteringMode 1
ExifFlash 16
ExifFocalLength 200
ExifColorSpace -1
ExifPixXDim 3456
ExifPixYDim 2304
20545 R03
ExifFocalXRes 3954.23340961098
ExifFocalYRes 3958.76288659794
ExifFocalResUnit 2
41985 0
41986 0
41987 0
41990 0
42240 2.2
ThumbnailCompression 6
ThumbnailResolutionX 72
ThumbnailResolutionY 72
ThumbnailResolutionUnit 2
JPEGInterFormat 9716
JPEGInterLength 4668

It would take some wizard to alter this in a series of image files without introducing some inconsistency. Much less be able to upload the altered image back to the camera/phone.


640 posted on 05/21/2006 12:34:37 PM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies ]

To: za_claws; js1138
Shows driver, looks like Kim, shows bra strip....not a male.

Maybe her male cousin?

Seriously, excellent job with those pictures. Also excellent job js1138 on pointing out how much data are embedded in cell phone pictures.
644 posted on 05/21/2006 1:06:47 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies ]

To: za_claws

Great pics. A car buff out there should be able to pinpoint the make of this vehicle. It sure looks like a Honda Accord to me - early 90s. Can we get a view of the entire wheel? Is there a picture of Kim's car around. Is that a fading of the paint on the roof or light dispersion? If the former we should be able to get a better match to the actual vehicle than the lab got with the DNA sample!


647 posted on 05/21/2006 1:14:02 PM PDT by bjc (Check the data!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies ]

To: za_claws
Jakki?


652 posted on 05/21/2006 1:55:50 PM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies ]

To: za_claws

655 posted on 05/21/2006 2:09:55 PM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies ]

To: za_claws

Nifong is going to claim these photos show here coming to the party? If so I don't see how this would help him at all. As we can see you would have her getting out of the car barefoot and cut. And in another photo of her walking into the house backwards without a shoe and passed out there without a shoe.


661 posted on 05/21/2006 2:27:35 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies ]

To: za_claws

"....prosecutors will argue, that photo actually shows the accuser being dropped off at the party, not leaving it,...."

TOO FUNNY, LOL!

Lets pretend that the guy (arm) "helping" her out of the car is pulling on her shoulder or hair as a "welcome" gesture, too. Geez!

He's obviously helping her to maintain her balance in the car, so as not to spill back out of the car.....I'm sure that a few seconds later he was placing her right leg/foot into the car in order to get the door shut with her completely inside and be done with the whole sorry episode......

but little did he know, that he should have called the cops to have her drunken --- removed from the property.


678 posted on 05/21/2006 5:01:50 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson