Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg
Check out this article from findlaw.com:

Is The District Attorney In The Duke Lacrosse Rape Scandal Turning A Blind Eye To Valuable Evidence?

The Cold, Hard Proof That Suggests The Three Defendants Are Innocent

By JONNA SPILBOR

----

Friday, May. 19, 2006

On Monday, May 15, a Durham County grand jury handed up a third indictment in the nothing-short-of-notorious Duke rape case. This latest indictment charges the lacrosse team's captain, David Evans, with first-degree rape, first-degree sexual assault, and first-degree kidnapping.

The charges against Evans are identical to those handed up last month against fellow players Reade Seligmann and Collin Finnerty. Still, this final indictment does come as a bit of surprise. As I detailed in a prior column, the cases against Seligmann and Finnerty appear quite weak. As I'll discuss in this column, the case against Evans may be even shakier.

-- http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20060519_spilbor.html

Does this article warrant its own thread?

364 posted on 05/19/2006 9:42:52 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H

According to Sean Hannity, the defense says it has plenty of exculpatory information they haven't shown the press.


365 posted on 05/19/2006 9:48:21 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

IMO, it does!


417 posted on 05/20/2006 7:06:10 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson