Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duke rape case set for 2007
Toronto Star ^ | May 19, 2006. 07:02 AM | staff

Posted on 05/19/2006 7:17:27 AM PDT by Perdogg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,161 next last
To: pray4liberty
Could this problem of suspending the students before they are proved guilty of a crime also be the result of the practice of 'tenure'? Many one dimensional professors who are misfits in the real world, get tenure at universities and use their misguided political and moral beliefs to indoctrinate young students' minds. Because they have tenure, you can't fire them! In my opinion, a big mistake was made when they allowed this practice, and I have children in the educational field!
101 posted on 05/19/2006 9:09:34 AM PDT by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Mort took that position? Wow, that is saying something when Mort goes so far as to make a statement of that degree.


102 posted on 05/19/2006 9:10:44 AM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
HE should be investigated by the State Attorney General of North Carolina.

Agreed but there are probably some connecting dots there also. YOU know what I'ahm talking bout. :o)

Admittedly not Civil Rights knowledgable here, it would seem to me that these boys have had their civil rights violated and the Feds should step in....or at least Jesse>barf

103 posted on 05/19/2006 9:12:24 AM PDT by daybreakcoming (If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
"The case "is not going to jump ahead of the line and be handled any differently," Superior Court Judge Ronald L. Stephens said at a hearing for sophomore Reade Seligmann."

So is the delay due to normal court backlog, or some other reason?
104 posted on 05/19/2006 9:14:55 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne
Greta Van Susteren reported the black man as saying after court to Reade Seligman, "YOU'RE a dead man walking!"...that definitely sounds like a threat, and that man should have been arrested and charged for threatening the life of Seligman, IMO. I wish I knew the law, because to the average person, it certainly seems like a 'change of venue' is called for in this case.

From the look of things, the New Black Panther pitbulls have clamped their jaws down on these guys, and they're not going to let go no matter what. I think they would follow these guys around no matter where the venue was.

This situation is Bonfire of the Vanities happening all over again.

105 posted on 05/19/2006 9:15:29 AM PDT by jpl (Victorious warriors win first, then go to war; defeated warriors go to war first, then seek to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateDepression

I think that Duke is far from unique in that policy.


106 posted on 05/19/2006 9:16:03 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: LWalk18
In addition, these type of racially charged trials always bring up the specter of possible riots.

Oh, that's right, threats of possible riots by the good citizens of Durham should trump the right to a fair and speedy trial of these boys. /sarc

107 posted on 05/19/2006 9:18:20 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

The defense said nothing about pushing ahead of anyone. The judge said something about that.

Durham county can not say our cops are too busy to give Miranda warnings and besides we do not Marandize anyone else. Similarly Durham County can not say, speedy trial, we don't give anyone no stinkin speedy trial.

That Durham routinely denies accused speedy trials does not trump the right of any particular person to a speedy trial. That other defendents routinely waive their speedy trial rights does not mean these guys lose their right to a speedy trial.

So the judge can say any hauty thing he wants about not pushing this trial ahead of others. These guys still have a right to a speedy trial.


108 posted on 05/19/2006 9:19:36 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: daybreakcoming

I think that in cases of moral turpitude of a serious nature, the identities of both the accused and the alleged victim should be kept confidential pending the results of a trial.

A grand jury indictment is not tantamount to a conviction.

No doubt the black racialist lobby, as always, has a hand in these cases, but my feelings are now that Nullfang, may have been intimate with the alleged victim and she's got that over him.


109 posted on 05/19/2006 9:21:10 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

That would really speak loudly to the scope of the problem wouldn't it?

I find it most ironic that those that scream the loudest about losing liberty are oh so often the very ones doing the very stealing of the liberty they claim to be holding so dear and defending so strongly.


110 posted on 05/19/2006 9:22:47 AM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: LWalk18

Exactly! Put investigators watching Kim and Crystal, and their pimp, then gather all the evidence.

Are they going to stop being prostitutes? If so, what are they going to do for the next 6 months? Not buy drugs? Not get drunk or high? Not whore?

They will both screw up big time. There is no way these two women make it to year's end without blowing it.


111 posted on 05/19/2006 9:23:52 AM PDT by David Allen (the presumption of innocence - what a concept!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: LWalk18
To be fair to the judge for a moment, we don't know how busy the court system in Durham County- given Durham's crime rate, I doubt that this the only criminal trial in town. For all we know setting this case a few months from know would mean bumping 10 cases into next year. No doubt this case will take several weeks to try given the nature of the case so far and you have to make sure that those days are available.

Sounds like some research to determine the length of the docket, average time from indictment to trial, etc. is in order.

112 posted on 05/19/2006 9:24:24 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
If they settle with the accuser, then it hands Nifong a way out of his mess. They are not going to do that.

They most certainly may. They are at risk of decades in prison. They certainly might apologize for calling her names at their house, pay her a bit of money and be done with this. That is why you should never let such settlements make you think that someone is guilty.
113 posted on 05/19/2006 9:24:55 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: David Allen
They will both screw up big time. There is no way these two women make it to year's end without blowing it.

Interesting choice of words in the context of the other ones you typed.......
114 posted on 05/19/2006 9:25:14 AM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Paying someone money for calling them names? Dang, that would cause alot of folks around here to be obliterated by crushing debt!


115 posted on 05/19/2006 9:26:42 AM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: David Allen

"They will both screw up big time. There is no way these two women make it to year's end without blowing it."....

Blowing it??

Was that a pun?


116 posted on 05/19/2006 9:27:05 AM PDT by texan75010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Among other tombstones in the cemetary of Justice, here lies the "right to a speedy trial" and "innocent until proven guilty". Let us mourn.


117 posted on 05/19/2006 9:33:07 AM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Neverforget01

Apparently NC has adopted its legal procedures from, I don't know, maybe Nicaragua?


118 posted on 05/19/2006 9:36:13 AM PDT by RecallMoran (Recall Brodhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: All

I see the democrats railing against GITMO and the administration in part because they are not getting the speedy trial some claim terrorists deserve when they were captured on the field of battle making war on our nations soldiers.

I see democrats disallowing a speedy trial for shite guys accused of rape with what seems to be no evidence at all.


Do I need glasses or is this actually what I am seeing?


119 posted on 05/19/2006 9:37:13 AM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateDepression

Shite should read White.


120 posted on 05/19/2006 9:37:55 AM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson