The fact they requested two white girls would only be relevant if someone thought they had planned the whole thing ahead of time in the sober light of day. Whereas if they did rape that girl, it's far more likely they formed the intention to do so after they started drinking and she started dancing.
On the other hand, if you're saying they would have gang-raped a young attractive white stripper, and you're right about that, it would be strong evidence that the crime wasn't racially motivated.
The point is that it shoots down the idea that the players had an itch for "ugly black hookers" (your phrase).
Whereas if they did rape that girl, it's far more likely they formed the intention to do so after they started drinking and she started dancing.
That is a huge IF in light of the DNA reports, the photos, and the timeline.
On the other hand, if you're saying they would have gang-raped a young attractive white stripper, and you're right about that,
That is not what I was saying, and you know it. Simple question-- based on what you know about the case, who do you think is telling the truth?
That wasn't the point.
The point was that there is no indication of such a fantasy as you suggest of raping black hookers, evidenced by the fact that they asked for white girls, not black girls.
You're trying to weasel out of your original thesis, but I don't blame you for abandoning it.