Yes, it seems to say that, but it also seems to say there was other semen that was mixed because the one that was matched is referred to as "single source." The statements SEEM to be saying that one male DNA was separate and others were mixed, otherwise the use of the term "single source" would seem unnecessary. Will Nifong try to argue this mixed semen was a mixture of the three boys? Semen can be dated somewhat by sperm motitlity and some other technical factors. I presume that testing for age of the semen is automatic in a rape kit test even in NC, lol! But I don't think it could possibly be the boys because they know if they ejaculated or there was a chance of any other form of DNA being left in or on her in an intimate location, they would never have said they didn't touch her. They would have said they had consensual or paid-for sex with her. So, if there is mixed semen in her in ADDITION to her boyfriend's, that creats and even bigger problem for Nifong. But I don't like the defense being coy with phrasing either. I would like for them to state categorically what all was found and what wasn't found.