Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

There is one fact that convinces me that this alleged victim's story is a complete fabrication- even more than the lack of DNA evidence and the corroboarative cab driver and phone logs - that is the testimony, or lack thereof, of the other dancer at the party. She initially came out saying that she didn't think there was a rape involved and later said that there could have been, because she wasn't with the victim the entire time. Well.... she drove the alleged victim from the party and you mean to tell me that this woman, who was supposedly gang raped by three men, didn't say anything about it to her!? The driver didn't like the white boys, so she makes an anonymous call claiming racial slurs. The call is ANONYMOUS and only mentions RACIAL SLURS??!! You mean to tell me that she had no clue that her dancing partner had been brutally gang raped? That this poor victim said nothing about it to her stripping "sistah"?... and the capper is that the rape story only comes up AFTER the alleged victim is confronted by police in a grocery store parking lot in an inebriated state and we learn that she has a history of alleging gang rapes.

This is BULL***T of the highest magnitude. This is Tawana Brawley times THREE!


34 posted on 05/15/2006 9:07:33 AM PDT by True-Stu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: True-Stu

I agree, but I think you are also falling prey to the piece-meal analysis on the news. Its not that that anyone "fact" cuts against her, its that there is literally all the evidence in its totality demonstrates that no crime ocurred. She claimed that the was violently beaten, strangled, robbed, raped orally, anally, vaginally for half an hour. This alleged horrific crime, denied by over forty people, left no trace. Even the so-called evidence on the fingernails undermines her claim. How could the boys commite this attack but leave no trace except on discarded nails, and those nails have the DNA on them of more than one person, and so they can't represent the attackers. All the "pro-prosecution" talking heads ever do is say how this thing or that thing can be explained away--the time stamps are forged, rape doesn't necessarily result in dna transfer etc. But the whole thing is mind boggling, it is fifty against one phony line up, dna against one phony line-up, cab driver and photos against one phony line-up and not a single talkign head has even positied a scenario that would fit with the known evidence.


36 posted on 05/15/2006 9:15:09 AM PDT by streeeetwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: True-Stu

That is but one of several head scratchers.


39 posted on 05/15/2006 9:19:59 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: True-Stu

I have only seen this reported once, but Kim Roberts made a reference to a bunch of "limp dick white boys."

That must have slipped her mind when she called 911.


66 posted on 05/15/2006 9:38:51 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson