I'm glad you brought this up. I haven't seen much speculation on here about the first player who was indentified.
Why didn't the investigator follow up the identification with a question about how certain she was? He did with the three players who have been indicted.
He's so sure he's got 3, why not go for the 4th? I'm sure he has jsut as much evidence against him.
When is the press going to wake up and ask him WHY he didn't indict the 4th guy. Did he get a "bye?" Parents not rich enough.