I want to see if she presents sworn testimony under oath. Until then, I really want to keep an open mind.
I want to believe in the ideal that truth and justice really mean something.
Maybe I'm naive.
I hope we can revive these threads when the trial is over.
I may find I'm eating crow for holding to those beliefs, but I really feel I'm not.
Can you understand why?
Ahem, she's already given sworn testimony under oath. Twice.
And both times what she had testified to is impossible to have occurred or to be true.
I want to believe in the ideal that truth and justice really mean something.
You call this justice? I saw a young man from a good family who had his whole world in front of him indicted today because a woman said he had a moustache and he didn't and never has.
Of course, you do realize, don't you, that because Nifong refused to even LOOK at those pictures that Cheshire tried to show him that this entire indictment can be thrown out, right?
That's UNETHICAL, as was the lineup, as was sending detectives over to the dorms to surprise the players when he KNEW that they had lawyers, as was arresting a cab drive after he didn't change his story about the Duke race case, as is calling the accuser a "victim," as is putting out pamphlets that say a rape DID OCCUR, et al.
What the HELL kind of justice do you believe in?