Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grand jury may consider new charges in Duke case
Raliegh Observer ^ | 5/15/06 | Ben Niolet

Posted on 05/15/2006 7:14:12 AM PDT by pissant

DURHAM - A Durham grand jury is scheduled to meet today, and the session could mean new charges in the investigation of a reported rape at a Duke lacrosse team party.

Two of the team's players were indicted in April on charges of first degree rape, first degree sex offense and first degree kidnapping. They are accused of assaulting an escort service dancer in a bathroom of a house at 610 N. Buchanan Blvd. Their lawyers say the men are innocent, and lawyers representing dozens of team members say that no sex or assault occurred at the March 13 party.

But the woman says she was attacked by three men, and Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong said he has been working on bringing charges against a third person.

WHAT WILL HAPPEN TODAY? If Nifong decides to submit the case, police investigators and possibly other witnesses will try to convince grand jurors in a secret session that the state has probable cause to bring a case forward. Grand jurors will hear only the prosecution's side of the case. The standard required for a true bill of indictment is far lower than the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard required for a conviction.

IF INDICTMENTS ARE ISSUED, WHEN WILL THEY BECOME PUBLIC? On April 17, a judge ordered the indictments in the lacrosse case sealed. The names of the players who were indicted were not released until 5 a.m. the next day when the players surrendered at the Durham County jail. If Nifong again requests that the indictments be sealed, the law allows a judge to keep them secret until the person is arrested or appears in court.

WHEN WILL ALL THE EVIDENCE BE REVEALED? State law requires prosecutors to turn over all of their case files to defense lawyers, but nothing requires the evidence to be turned over to the public. In open court hearings, lawyers often discuss some of the evidence, but the state's case may not be revealed until trial. No trial dates have been set. When a report on the DNA testing is complete, Nifong is required by law to turn it over to all 46 members of the lacrosse team who submitted DNA samples.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? The cases against Reade William Seligmann, 20, of Essex Fells, N.J., and Collin Finnerty, 19, of Garden City, N.Y., are moving forward. Finnerty has a court date in June. Seligmann is scheduled to appear in court Thursday. His attorney, Kirk Osborn, has filed a series of motions challenging Nifong's handling of the case and asking a judge to bar the prosecutor from further involvement.


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; wtf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800 ... 2,161 next last
To: Locomotive Breath

One of the more intriguing statements Cheshire made in the press conference was when a reporter asked him what the accuser's motive would be for making a false accusation, Cheshire responded by saying he believes he now knows what her motive is, but he is not willing to tell it to reporters at this time.

Your speculation was that she was worried that Child Protective Services might take her children away. My own idea was that she probably was thinking very narrowly of herself, and simply wanted to transform herself from someone who at that particular moment in time apparently was in trouble with the police for public drunkenness into someone who was a victim.

I am now wondering if she has had a history of treatment with Durham Center Access for mental health problems and/or substance abuse, and didn't want the consequences that another round of treatment there would bring (which might include consequences for her children), and therefore cried rape upon realizing that the police were admitting her into Durham Center Access. I don't at this time buy any theory that she hatched up a plot at 2:00 am that night to extort money from the players by crying rape (although of course we were told at a later point in time she was contacting lawyers to explore a civil suit).

But there may be more to it. In any event, I found it quite interesting that Cheshire now believes he has a fix on her motivation for the false charges.


761 posted on 05/15/2006 2:02:51 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 719 | View Replies]

To: wiltale

Next, they're going to want dinner. Let's get our priorities straignt! At least I don't have Howlin's sheet issues.


762 posted on 05/15/2006 2:03:12 PM PDT by RecallMoran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 755 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I loved it when he stated over and over and over again "THIS FALSE ACCUSER"


763 posted on 05/15/2006 2:03:46 PM PDT by dubyawhoiluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane

Catherine Crier covering it now.


764 posted on 05/15/2006 2:03:59 PM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 744 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
Did the defense possibly get into 610 before the police did and get a look at/photos of the trash can?

If the defense got there first, it's because the police didn't do their job. It sounds like the police didn't believe there was a reason to go further until the DA took over.

765 posted on 05/15/2006 2:05:20 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
"People DO wear a false mustache." Actual quote from lib on FOX.

Yes, and a rubber nose and glasses, too.

Are these people for real? Good grief!

766 posted on 05/15/2006 2:05:24 PM PDT by Shelayne (Antique Media--losing value everyday...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies]

To: RecallMoran; All

BTW, after Mr. Evan's statement today, anyone think Nifong has turned a lacrosse player that we have not heard about?


767 posted on 05/15/2006 2:05:35 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 762 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

I don't know if you ever could have hired her. Her claim to drama queen fame is that she was an (over)zealous prosecutor herself. She and Nifong are two peas in a pod.


768 posted on 05/15/2006 2:07:09 PM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 699 | View Replies]

To: RecallMoran

LOL! I hear you. Well, I'm off. I'll have to check back later.


769 posted on 05/15/2006 2:07:39 PM PDT by wiltale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 762 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Not a chance.

We also know now that Nifong's "wall of silence" was a lie.


770 posted on 05/15/2006 2:09:26 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 767 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

One of the more intriguing statements Cheshire made in the press conference was when a reporter asked him what the accuser's motive would be for making a false accusation, Cheshire responded by saying he believes he now knows what her motive is,
_______________________________________________________

That is intriguing. I agree that it is likely she was only thinking of herself not her kids that night.


771 posted on 05/15/2006 2:09:41 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 761 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

As we all here subsequently brainstormed we came up with about an even half dozen reasons why she might have cried rape, but the bottom line on all of them is to allow her to take control of the situation with little thought for the future consequences.


772 posted on 05/15/2006 2:11:06 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 761 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

" I would not be walking out smiling .."

You probably wouldn't be able to walk normally for a few days after the frenzied , non lubricated, violent raping and sodomizing this woman claims to endured.
The surgical consult on this woman should be informative.
I find it impossible to believe that non consensual, non lubricated, hurried and frenzied sodomy times three ( or 20 ) would not inflicted anal tears and rectal bleeding - at a minimum.


773 posted on 05/15/2006 2:13:03 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Sean talking about it now. Some chick lawyer (Kimberly) ashamed that he didn't share evidence or talk to Lawyers. Guy lawyer saying he doesn't trust secret polygraphs. Saying fingernail evidence important. Saying semen found on floor and on towel in bathroom. (eww)


774 posted on 05/15/2006 2:13:28 PM PDT by RecallMoran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 771 | View Replies]

To: GAgal

Oh my goodness....Gloria Allreds spawn is screeching...screeching!


775 posted on 05/15/2006 2:15:37 PM PDT by Jrabbit (Scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 764 | View Replies]

To: RecallMoran

Certainly private polygraphs by themselves would not convince me much. But that is one tiny fraction of what the defense has.


776 posted on 05/15/2006 2:15:55 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies]

To: Jrabbit

Oh my goodness....Gloria Allreds spawn is screeching...screeching!
_________________________________________________

And this is news how?


777 posted on 05/15/2006 2:16:46 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 775 | View Replies]

To: RecallMoran

"Guy lawyer saying he doesn't trust secret polygraphs."

Does he trust DA's who won't administer them to suspects who volunteer?


778 posted on 05/15/2006 2:16:55 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies]

To: JLS

If the police turn down a public polygraph what type of freak complains about a private polygraph. Come on.


779 posted on 05/15/2006 2:17:03 PM PDT by streeeetwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Has anyone heard of this semen on floor and on towel thing before? I would be unhappy if I were his roommates but that's still not on Mother-of-the-year.


780 posted on 05/15/2006 2:17:29 PM PDT by RecallMoran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800 ... 2,161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson