Posted on 05/15/2006 7:14:12 AM PDT by pissant
I've typed many a police report. She is legally considered a victim, along with the State.
"Personally, I am on the side of justice."
Me too. So far, we've only heard from the defense.
____________________________________________
So you missed Nifongs 70, yes seventy, make that SEVENTY statement to the press, three indictment and false leaks last week about the DNA?
In most states this case wouldnt make it to trial. My bet, in fact, is this wont even make it to trial in NC either.
The DA wouldnt be so desperate and sloppy if he had a stronger case. Weak cases usually die early.
I heard on the radio today: one guy saying why are the news corpse reporting this Duke stuff?
he said: we have Health Care, gas prices & a white house that has been lying to us. the DJ agreed with him. there are so many other things more important.
the problem is they had no problem discussing it endlessly when it made the Duke guys out to be rapists born of privilege
Discovery is supposed to be turned over to the defense by Thursday, Seligmann's hearing. So far the MSM seems to be giving Nifong the benefit of the doubt, trusting he has a smoking gun we haven't seen. Hopefully, the defense will alert the press if there is no "there" there, and they will demand some answers from Nifong and the police.
You know I have tremendous respect for you on this board.
But until we've heard every piece of evidence and until that time, I can't say the defendants are innocent or not.
Complete Eyewitness News Coverage of the Investigation - ABC NEWS CHANNEL 11
Duke Lacrosse Controversy - THE NEWS&OBSERVER
That's the part that got to Kimberly as well. Now it's only NG and Wendy...they're still at it.
"In most states this case wouldnt make it to trial."
You'd be surprised. I've worked for a charging prosecutorial atty, I've seen lots of cases I thought shouldn't of been charged and they were.
Our young herione, alledged victim was charged with trying to run over a cop in 2002.
I wonder if she is still on probation or parole, therefore making her ineligible to vote.
While it wouldn't be relevant to the rape case (case may be a generous word).... But if this information is correct...
Voter Reg. No: 000030067414
Owner ID: 8270321
Residence: 2111 Charles St. Durham, NC 27707-2907
Registration Date: Sept. 10, 2004
Birthplace: North Carolina
Party: Democratic
Precinct: 09
Congressional: 4th Congress
School/Ward: 2A Ward 2
Wouldn't it be funny if she were illegally registered to vote? A little if she voted fradulently in '04... and absolutely hillarious if she voted fraudently in the recent primary.
I'm just thinking out loud, I'm not as smart as Buckhead.
There is no victim. There is an accuser.
This case is reminiscent of Kate Faber and Kobe Bryant.
Yes, there was sex between the two of them, but there was also sex between Faber and two other men, 48 hours on either side of her encounter with Bryant.
The DA in Colorado Springs realized he couldn't put his accuser on the stand with that kind of timeline, and Bryant wanted to get this off the front page. So he settled.
But these guys are not going to settle, and Crystal Mangum is going to be left, if she's lucky, with nothing. If she's not, she'll have a defamation lawsuit hanging over her head.
I don't care what's in the threads on FR. We've been at it before and we've been on opposites before. Like this would be any diff?
I've typed police reports for a living. She would be a victim.
And again, one of the defendants in this case alleged committed assault?
And you all are calling the victim in this case a skank? Big deal.
you sound like your mind is made up. need I remind you no evidence has been presented in court?
why doesn't the treatment of the Cab driver witness upset you?
why didn't you post when Nancy Grace and Kimberly Gulfoil called them rapists night after night?
why doesn't the Distric Attorney leaking damaging parts of reports upset you?
you are trying to make yourself sound like the voice of reason but you really just have a different opinion and you are hoping to convince other people of your side. me thinks
you have supported the dancer all along. you are mad at those guys: huh?
There is nothing else. If the accuser can't determine whether or not one of her accusers had a mustache (yet she identifies him with 90% certainty without the mustache), she's going to get shiskabobbed on the stand.
From what I understand of the AV's appearance and condition, I doubt that any of the boys would have had any desire to have any contact at all with her.
But on the remote chance that not only one but three were so inclined, it's even more doubtful that they would have chosen this behavior, even if they were drunk, because of the risk of being reported by her, and also because they would have been concerned that their teammates would find out, ridicule them for their poor taste, and condemn them for such a heinous act, and that at least one teammate would testify truthfully.
I don't care what it was. The defendant in this case is also a defendant in an another assault case. This does speak to his character.
Well good then, since those links are off site you can read them.
I d/n hear it but if he did good for him! It is long past time, that the skank has been protected for too long. She is a 27 y/o woman who has made some very serious charges against these three young men. Their names and pix have been plastered all over the country and she has been 'protected'! Bull tickee!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.