[don'tbedenied]

"Prior sexual history of the victim would not be allowable in California courts."

Even if the evidence might refute the rape kit analysis? I have to doubt that. If she had rough sex immediately prior to the party that would have to be admissible (not to prove she's a slut that's a given) but to prove someone else could have caused the "trauma consistent with rape".

[Swanks]

"Prior sexual history of the victim would not be allowable in California courts."

I think "Prior sexual history" refers to years gone by. Not ten minutes ago.

[cherry]

the defense would have the right to have the whole report about the DNA read into the record.....if the DA wants to hang on DNA, then he'll hang.....