[Locomotive Breath]

I re-read the Durham H-S article. The logic apparently goes like this

1) The DNA is a MISMATCH with all but one player. This excludes all other players.

2) The "rapist" is known to be one of the players.

3) Therefore, by process of elimination, the DNA is a sufficient match to the unindicted player #3.

If you introduce one other person into the party then this logic fails unless you DNA test the additional person to prove he is a mismatch like all the other players.

[JLS]

If you introduce one other person into the party then this logic fails
___________________________________________________

And we know one team member was not tested.

BTW, the logic also falls because DNA on or under popoff nails does not prove sexual activity.