Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jezebelle

I thought that maybe some of the 13 were more fragile or harder to extract than others.

Well then this beats the hell out of me.

How can they
1) extract all 13 from lax player #3 and
2) extract all 13 from the "tissue" and
3) find some that DO match but
4) find some that DON'T match

and then declare that there's any relevance at all? It seems to me that a no match on any of the 13 is a no match for the entire sample. What am I missing?


251 posted on 05/12/2006 11:05:03 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]


To: Locomotive Breath

I don't think you're missing anything. I think Nifong is missing something, and that something is.....evidence, including admissable DNA evidence! ;>


252 posted on 05/12/2006 11:12:16 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: Locomotive Breath
So we have to surmise the sample was so small they couldn't extract all 13 markers. Yet the AV clawed away and only came up with a minute sample?

Finally, the girl was asked to leave, they slipped money under the door asking her to leave according to Kim who was/wasn't in the bathroom with her? Is it possible the guys "helped" her out the door? They did lock her out.

Bottom line, none of this is evidence of rape.

255 posted on 05/12/2006 11:18:33 AM PDT by Neverforget01 (Proud enemy of the DBM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson