Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GAgal

"Nifong obviously believed the semen retrieved was that of the players, because she convinced him she had been with no one consensually"

I heard on a radio w/ABC an hour ago that the oral DNA swab of the "boyfriend" was taken on May 3, only 10 days ago....


1,489 posted on 05/13/2006 11:04:13 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]


To: Vn_survivor_67-68

That was the day after the indictment, wasn't it?


1,493 posted on 05/13/2006 11:16:51 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1489 | View Replies ]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

Yes, I just read that here: http://abcnews.go.com/US/LegalCenter/story?id=1958031&page=1

When the first DNA results were anticipated, I read that under NC law as soon as the results came in they had to be given to the DNA donor. I wonder if Nifong broke the law by leaking the results before the defense had them, or failing to provide the defense with the complete report showing the semen match the first time?


1,494 posted on 05/13/2006 11:18:30 AM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1489 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson