Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: toldyou

What is the actual evidence that no player had a moustache?


1,436 posted on 05/13/2006 9:45:33 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1430 | View Replies ]


To: js1138

Duke Lacross players are not permitted to have mustaches...rule.


1,439 posted on 05/13/2006 9:47:53 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1436 | View Replies ]

To: js1138

No player had a moustache at least during the season. It was against team rules.

Out of 45 or 46 guys I'm sure at least one of them might have grown a moustache in the past.

That is why I suspect the DA got ahold of a lot of old photos of the team members to show the false accuser before she looked at the line-up pictures. If one of them had a moustache in the earlier photos that might be why she mentioned it.

It wouldn't be legal for the police or DA to do that but perhaps someone else did. Maybe the same person who ran the Dun & Bradstreet report to identify the players with the most money.


1,454 posted on 05/13/2006 9:57:39 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1436 | View Replies ]

To: js1138

Well, for one thing, Duke lacrosse players aren't allowed to have mustaches.


1,461 posted on 05/13/2006 10:00:50 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1436 | View Replies ]

To: js1138

I can't point to a link, but it has been repeatedly posted on here, that the Lacrosse team was not allowed to have facial hair.


1,466 posted on 05/13/2006 10:05:45 AM PDT by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1436 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson