Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: OakOak

They just said that the Defense had acknowledged something was found at the first press conference, but that is wasn't DNA...........what does that mean?


82 posted on 05/11/2006 2:54:10 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: All

Is anybody besides me sitting here, just shaking your head?


83 posted on 05/11/2006 2:57:23 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

but that is wasn't DNA..

I have no clue

This is what was said after the first round:
"The tests found DNA matches to two players, from a towel outside the bathroom and on another object, Cheshire said.

One sample was from a player's semen and another was a different type of DNA, Cheshire said. He said that was to be expected in a bathroom shared by the three men who lived in the house."

Are they talking about that "Different type of DNA?"

DEFENSE attorneys will have a ball with this:

"Investigators found no DNA under the woman's remaining fingernails, or on those taken during the search of the rental house at 610 N. Buchanan Blvd.


http://www.newsobserver.com/100/story/427550.html


105 posted on 05/11/2006 3:25:57 AM PDT by OakOak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson