Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: OakOak

More from the ABC article posted.:



They insist that results from this set of DNA tests are also inconclusive and that there is no match, and that to say otherwise is "very misleading."

They also say it would not be unusual to find players' DNA in the bathroom or garbage can of a house where some of them lived and many others spent time.



The defense will almost certainly argue that these new DNA results should not be permitted in court, since they are not a perfect match. In cases where DNA evidence is not a perfect match it is sometimes considered inadmissible as evidence.


191 posted on 05/11/2006 8:20:06 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: snarkytart

http://www.co.durham.nc.us/departments/shrf/IPS/index.cfm?DateLookUp=30&RequestTimeout=300

ELMOSTAFA, MOECELDEN, A
Date Confined 5/10/2006
Date Released 5/10/2006
Statute Description MISDEMEANOR LARCENY
Bond Type SECURED
Bond Amount $700.00

(just thought I'd make it official)


193 posted on 05/11/2006 8:26:00 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

To: snarkytart
They also say it would not be unusual to find players' DNA in the bathroom or garbage can of a house where some of them lived and many others spent time.

Remember the Defense press conference? They said that then, too.

215 posted on 05/11/2006 9:15:05 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson