[snarkytart]

I watched that segment also.

What Megan said is that a hair might be a match to a Duke lacrosse player.

Nevertheless, Megan said that such evidence is so weak that she will love to be the defense attorney for the matched-hair player, assuming that's the third player that accuser had mentioned before.

If the hair matches a lacrosse player that the accuser has not mentioned before, then the hair is a big dud
_____________

Thanks for the clarification.
I was under the impression from some who watched last night, that Megan said she heard there is a DNA match to one player, and the panel was speculating on whether it was a hair. So...Megan's report was not that definitive???

[Jezebelle]

I know your question was to George, but let me butt in and say that no, it wasn't definitive at all.