I do not have distain. I do not buy your argument that the bill of rights prevents you ( or me..or anyone else) from being identified.
If noone can be truthfully identified (outside their own word about their identity, the rule of law cannot be ever be enforced. You know the rule of law you claim to respect????
Like every other post you make regarding this issue you oppose the ID when your real opposition is about the USE of it when it becomes ABUSE.
If people in this nation actually argued their opposition and offered solutions for debate that will lead to progress on the issue at hand then we wouldn't have endless threads where people pretend to argue the issue (ID) when they actually argue something entirely different(USE AND ABUSE OF IT).
Opposition without a qualifying alternative solution is the abomination. The lose of power by the leftist democratic party demonstrates where your line of opposition goes. It gets rejected by more and more people every day.
When people simply pose what they are against, the short term will see agreement by those that also disagree. Long term people want a solution. That means they want to hear the alternative that you would support to combat that which you oppose. Absent that message support for your opposition is lost.....like I said just look to the democratic party for example.
What form of ID do you support and in what contexts do you think an ID is proper?
I would love to hear your response to this two part question but my bet is that you will duck it because you know what questions I will pose to you when indeed you do answer them!