Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueStateDepression
An ID itself is in no way unconstitutional

You're right. It only violates the Bill of Rights, of which we are the only country in the world with one.

Please explain to me how the intent of long dead people can be applied to something they had no concept of.

Throughout the history of this country there have been spies, anarchists and other evil doers. Why do you say the founders had no concept of this?
351 posted on 05/09/2006 7:08:39 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]


To: hedgetrimmer

Violates the bill of rights? BWAAA HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA ok then.

I said they had no concept of id'ing people getting on an airpane soas to weed out those that would fly them into buildings. If you really think that all of yesteryears contexts can be applied today then you are free to think that.

You have ID in your wallet and you want that ID to be unique to you......When it comes to your bank account....you do not want anyone else accessing your money....are you opposing this? NO. Alot of talk that leads nowhere in reality.

We need ID and that is a fact of today's life that you can not honestly dispute. I advocate that ID being as technologically advanced and accurate as it can be today and everyday moving forward. I advocate removing redundnacy and unproductivity by eliminating various forms of ID and replacing it with one all encompassing ID that is used for ID purposes across the spectrum where ID is needed. You can oppose it ( sometimes ....as is in your case) or you can support it.


364 posted on 05/09/2006 7:36:08 AM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson