Your right was not violated because you were not drafted.
So what are you complaining about again? Your own choice?
((((((Identification purposes alone are a fine use for an ID card. ))))))
I have been saying that al along and have been called a whole host of things for saying it, I am left wondering if you will be attacked the same way.......But my guess is you won't be because your nickname does not draw such kneejerk reactions ;)
In a time of war I have ZERO problem with tracking military movements and actions.
I do not advocate a policy of abuse with a Real ID. I do advocate a policy of indentifying true identity in order to hold people accountable for the actions they take under the rule of law. I believe that to be as patriotic as it gets and the very fabric of this nation.
If the government was to abuse such an entity then by all means I am all for prosecuting them for those actions. That fits with my position just fine. Criminal actions are criminal actions no matter who or what group of who's take those actions.
I did not complain about my military ID, I was simply stating that the civilian population would not be to keen on this type of ID. This type of ID place on the civilian population would be a violation of their rights. The government has no right to track its citizens without just cause, for instance, if they are suspected of a crime. That is an individual issue. On a national level, they cannot generally make every citizen a suspect under the guise of security...