Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: paudio
Conservatism, the way I understand it, refers to the idea to keep the social order as it is, or if it changes, it happens gradually.

While the terms "radical", "liberal", "conservative", and "reactionary" generically refer to people who want a huge change, a significant change, minimal change, or else a change back to the way things were, the terms "liberal" and "conservative" have also come to describe specific target social conditions. The use of the terms for that purpose is in some ways unfortunate, since it tends to muddle their meanings, but I don't really know any non-pejorative alternatives.

109 posted on 05/03/2006 4:14:37 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
the terms "liberal" and "conservative" have also come to describe specific target social conditions.

In any given context they can be correctly applied in that manner. The problem is when that context isn't established up front and then maintained through the entire argument.

112 posted on 05/03/2006 4:20:12 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson