------------- Libertarian Capitalism is an extreme form of Moral Liberalism.
Let's start here. They've jumped from libertarian theory, to economic theory. Capitalism in particular. Then economic theory is equated to moral theory. It's completely irrational. It's a pile of putrid rubbish.
"For libertarians, there are no positive rights (such as to food or shelter or health care), only negative rights (such as to not be assaulted, abused, robbed or censored).
A right belongs to the individual and no polarity whatsoever. Moral codes exist to protect those rights. You have a right to life and a right to sovereignty of will and to property. It is absolutely impossible to have a right to food, shelter and heathcare if they are not your property, or the service was not paid for in a fair exchange, because those things never belonged to you in the first place. You must obtain them. If obtaining them involves other people whatsoever, you must deal with them in a fair and just manner. The only way to deal in a fair and just manner is to ensure the rights of all parties are protected at all times.
Libertaianism is a fundamental theory of rational being interaction that protects every individual and all of their rights absolutely. Liberalism is a theory of interaction that is by it's very nature completely arbitrary and undefinable in any general, specific, or permanent basis at all. Liberalism is basically an authoritarian tyranny plain and simple. The concept of rights is arbitrary and based on whatever the powers that be dictate. Liberalism is authoritarian serfdom and slavery.
Read Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, The Constitution of Liberty, or visit some valid libertarian philosophy sources to learn about libertarianism. The Libertarian party is not a source, nor are the moronic pamphleteer sites you've sourced. Note that sometime before the middle of the last century the liberals co-opted the word liberalism. Most of the founders of this country were classical liberals, essentially libertarians. Modern liberals co-opted the word as a con to reintroduce their authoritarian socialist schemes.
As far as learning about modern liberalism, read John Rawls, A Theory of Justice. That's gives framework for all variations of liberalism.
Hmmm, where did our friend ghostmonkey go, once we started posting philosophical criticism of the Lakoff map?
I find it interesting how the Lakoff map breaks up the major components of the GOP coalition, while it coalesces the all centrists under a center-left "moral order"-"moral rules" coalition. This is deliberate, a design on the part of Lakoff to frame progressive politics on a Richard Rorty model of "common values". E.g. "We" all agree on the need for national health care, so "we" will put it in place, never mind the rights it violates or what some old piece of paper says.
This is quite opposed to the relationship between man and the state proposed by conservatism, libertarianism, and constitutionalism.