Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The CFR and the Trilateral Commission - The two organizations that run the United States
unknown | Melvin Sickler

Posted on 05/02/2006 11:55:13 AM PDT by Marxbites

The Council on Foreign Relations And the Trilateral Commission - The two organizations that run the United States

There are two groups of elite men and women in particular that most American people do not know about, but which are a clear threat and danger to the freedom of the American people. These are the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission.

Right now the United States is completely under the control of those who run these two organizations (David Rockefeller in particular). It is therefore important to understand these organizations if we wish to understand what has been taking place in the United States since the early 1900’s.

The resource material I am using that explains in depth what these two organizations are all about was written by Jack Newell and Devvy Kidd ("Why A Bankrupt America?", Project Liberty, P.O. Box 741075, Arvada, CO 80006-9075). Please allow me to share the main ideas with you.

Edward Mandell House The Council on Foreign Relations was founded in 1921 by Edward Mandell House, who had been the chief advisor of President Woodrow Wilson. Actually, he was more than just a prominent aide of the President; he dominated the President. He was referred to as Wilson’s "alter ego" (other self), and was credited for being the most powerful individual in the United States during the Wilson Administration from 1913 until 1921.

House was a Marxist whose goal was to socialize the United States. In 1912, House wrote the book "Philip Dru: Administrator" in which he stated that he was working for "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx." In this book, House laid out a plan for the conquest of America, telling how both the Democratic and Republican Parties would be controlled, and be used as instruments in the creation of a socialistic government. And he asked for the establishment of a state-controlled central bank, which were both proposed in "The Communist Manifesto".

And it was in 1913, during the very first year of the House-dominated Wilson Administration, that both of these proposals became laws. The Federal Reserve Act was passed, which brought into power a private central bank to create the money of the United States, taking this power away from the United States Congress. And the 16th Amendment to the United States Constitution, the graduated income tax as proposed by Karl Marx, was also ratified.

The Council on Foreign Relations In 1921, House and his friends formed the Council on Foreign Relations whose purpose right from its conception was to destroy the freedom and independence of the United States, and to lead the country into a one-world government.

Right from its beginning, in 1921, the CFR began to attract men of power and influence. In the late 1920’s, important financing for the CFR came from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Foundation. In 1940, at the invitation of President Roosevelt, members of the CFR gained domination over the State Department, and they have maintained this domination ever since. Its intentions The late Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton’s mentor), Professor of History at Georgetown University, member of the CFR, stated in his book, "Tragedy & Hope":

"The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established."

Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR for 16 years, warned the American people of the organization’s intentions:

"The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common — they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government."

And Dan Smoot, a former member of the FBI Headquarters staff in Washington, D.C., summarized the organization’s purpose as follows:

"The ultimate aim of the CFR is to create a one-world socialist system, and to make the U.S. an official part of it."

In other words, the CFR’s activities are treasonous to the U.S. Constitution. Their goal is to put an end to the United States of America, and to make the country a part of their global government scheme.

Its influence In 1944 and in 1948, the Republican candidate for President, Thomas Dewey, was a CFR member. In later years, Republicans Eisenhower and Nixon were members of the CFR, as were Democrats Stevenson, Kennedy, Humphrey, and McGovern. (Note: We believe Kennedy became disloyal to the CFR prior to his assassination.") The American people think that they have a choice when they vote for a President, but the truth of the matter is, with few exceptions: Presidential candidates for decades have been CFR members.

In one of the CFR’s annual reports, published in 1978, it listed a membership of 1878 members. Eleven of its members at this time were United States Senators, with even more Congressmen belonging to the organization. 284 of its members listed in this report were United States Government officials. And the Chairman of the Board of this immensely powerful pyramid was stated as being none other than David Rockefeller himself.

The CFR not only has its members in the United States Government, but its influence has also spread to other vital areas of American life. According to Newell:

"Its members have run, or are running, NBC and CBS, ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Washington Post’, ‘The Des Moines Register’, and many other important newspapers. The leaders of ‘Time’, ‘Newsweek’, ‘Fortune’, ‘Business Week’, and numerous other publications are CFR members. The organization’s members also dominate the academic world, top corporations, the huge tax-exempt foundations, labor unions, the military, and just about every segment of American life."

Barry Goldwater states in his book, "With No Apologies", on page 231:

"Does it not seem strange to you that these men just happened to be CFR and just happened to be on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, that absolutely controls the money and interest rates of this great country without benefit of Congress? A privately owned organization, the Federal Reserve, which has absolutely nothing to do with the United States of America!"

And Newell continues to write:

"Not every member of the CFR is fully committed to carrying out Edward Mandell House’s conspiratorial plan. Many have been flattered by an invitation to join a study group, which is what the CFR calls itself. Others go along because of personal benefits, such as a nice job and a new importance. But all are used to promote the destruction of U.S. sovereignty."

All aspects of American life are dominated The members of the CFR dominate almost every aspect of American life, yet most Americans have never even heard of the Council on Foreign Relations. One reason for this is probably because there are over 170 journalists, correspondents, and communications executives who are members of the CFR, and who do not write about the organization. Also, it is an express condition of membership that no one is to disclose what goes on at CFR meetings.

Congressmen John R. Rarick had warned:

"The CFR, dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax-exempt foundations, and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor, military, education, and mass communication-media, should be familiar to every American concerned with good government, and with preserving and defending the U.S. Constitution and our free-enterprise system. Yet, the nation’s right-to-know machinery, the news media, usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities. “

"The CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitution Republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship."

The CFR now has its main headquarters at the corner of Park Avenue and 68th Street in New York City, in a building given to the organization by the Rockefeller family in 1929. Its main goal is still to create a one-world government by destroying the freedom and independence of all nations, especially the United States. And David Rockefeller continues to be its Chairman of the Board.

The Trilateral Commission Unfortunately, the Council on Foreign Relations is not the only group proposing an end to the sovereignty of the United States. In 1973, The Trilateral Commission was founded to work for the same goal: a one-world government.

The Trilateral Commission's roots stem from the book, "Between Two Ages", written by Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1970. In this book, Brzezinski praised Marxism, thought of the United States as obsolete, and praised the formation of a one-world government. His thinking closely parallels that of CFR founder Edward Mandell House.

Marxism On page 72, Brzezinski writes: "Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief."

On page 83, he states: "Marxism disseminated on the popular level in the form of Communism, represented a major advance in man's ability to conceptualize his relationship to his world."

On page 123, we find: "Marxism supplied the best available insight into contemporary reality."

What Mr. Brzezinski fails to tell his readers is that approximately 100 million human beings have been murdered under Marxism "in the form of Communism" just in this Twentieth Century. It has enslaved a billion more, and has been responsible for those who live in Communist-dominated countries. There is nothing like being brainwashed!

For world government Zbigniew Brzezinski's "Between Two Ages" was published in 1970 while he was a professor in New York City. David Rockefeller read the book and, in 1973, launched the new Trilateral Commission, whose purposes include linking North America, Western Europe, and Japan

"in their economic relations, their political and defense relations, their relations with developing countries, and their relations with Communist countries."

As Newell writes:

"The original literature of The Trilateral Commission also states, exactly as Brzezinski's book had proposed, that the more advanced Communist States could become partners in the alliance leading to world government. In short, David Rockefeller implemented Brzezinski's proposal."

Rockefeller appointed Zbigniew Brzezinski to be the Director of The Trilateral Commission.

Jimmy Carter In 1973, Jimmy Carter became a student of Brzezinski, and a founding member of the Trilateral Commission. On March 21, 1978, "The New York Times" featured an article about Zbigniew Brzezinski's close relationship with the President. In part, it reads:

"The two men met for the first time four years ago when Mr. Brzezinski was executive director of The Trilateral Commission… and had the foresight to ask the then obscure former Governor of Georgia to join its distinguished ranks. Their initial teacher-student relationship blossomed during the campaign, and appears to have grown closer still."

To think that the teacher in this relationship praised Marxism, and wanted to form a one-world government. And the student was to become the President of the United States. During the 1976 political campaign, Carter repeatedly told the nation that he was going to get rid of the Establishment Insiders if he became president. But when he took office, he promptly filled his Administration with members of the Council on Foreign Relations (284 to be exact) and The Trilateral Commission, the two most prominent insider organizations in America. Included in this list of members of The Trilateral Commission were Walter Mondale and Dr. Henry Kissinger.

Beginning with Jimmy Carter, all the recent presidents, including President Clinton, have promptly filled their administrations with members of the Council on Foreign relations and The Trilateral Commission.

The Effects The common everyday American citizen does not need to be told that there is a controlled government running the United States. But when we understand exactly what the Council on Foreign Relations and The Trilateral Commission are, and how its members hold key positions in the Government, it becomes all the more clear. As Newell writes:

"The effects of the Council on Foreign Relation and The Trilateral Commission on the affairs of our nation is easy to see. Our own Government no longer acts in its own interest, we no longer win any wars we fight, and we constantly tie ourselves to international agreements, pacts, and conventions. And, our leaders have developed blatant preferences for Communist U.S.S.R., Communist Cuba, and Communist China, while they continue to work for world government, which has always been the goal of Communism…”

"The real goal of our own Government’s leaders is to make the United States into a carbon copy of a Communist state, and then to merge all nations into a one-world system run by a powerful few."

Barry Goldwater once stated on this subject:

"The Trilateral Commission is international, and it is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power – political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical."

As with the CFR, not all the members of The Trilateral Commission are fully committed to the destruction of the United States. Some just go along for the ride, to obtain fame, comfortable living, and constant flattery. But some, of course, really do run things and some, of course, really do run things and work against the independence of the United States.

In conclusion The American people may think that they live in a free country when, in reality, things could not be more controlled. The American public must be made aware of what is really taking place in the united States.

The key to obtain our freedom, to have a true independence, is to free ourselves from the yoke of International Finance. How true it is to state that those who control the money of a country control everything in that country.

Every citizen of the United States should become informed about these inside organizations, and make it a point not to vote nor to promote those, who are members for these organizations. And to demand a reform of the financial laws of the country, especially to repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and to implement the philosophy of Social Credit into the laws of the country.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Society
KEYWORDS: 109th; bush; cfr; communism; communists; globalism; globalists; iran; iraq; israel; jbsthinksyourenuts; marxism; rockefeller; socialism; socialists; tinfoil; trilateralcommission
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-207 next last
To: gondramB

The “real Marxists” I’ve known have been against private ownership, religion, etc. and advocated an all powerful centralized government. But central to their personalities, it always seems, is the tendency to violate their own principles in order to gain some form of social dominance over others. Give any Marxist access to real power, and he will transform into a demagogue with leftist tendencies.


121 posted on 05/03/2006 6:55:15 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Leftists will never stand up like men and fight for their true beliefs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Yep, Castro, Chavez etc...


122 posted on 05/03/2006 7:01:46 PM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
The CFR has been trying for 6 years to get tough border security passed.

Have they been insisting on a border-security-only bill, or have they, like the President, been demanding a "comprehensive reform" that legalizes illegals here in some way, shape, or form? If the latter, then they'd have to know that that's the whole sticking point that's preventing any progress. See tagline.

123 posted on 05/03/2006 7:24:30 PM PDT by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: inquest
>>Have they been insisting on a border-security-only bill, or have they, like the President, been demanding a "comprehensive reform" that legalizes illegals here in some way, shape, or form? If the latter, then they'd have to know that that's the whole sticking point that's preventing any progress. See tagline.<<

I don't know whether their approach on illegals is better or worse than the President's but their approach comes up way short - they don't really suggest any action on existing illegals except closing the borders in both directions.

I'm not saying the CFR is always doing the right thing but rather that many of the harshest criticisms of the CFR are off base.
124 posted on 05/03/2006 7:33:49 PM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
they don't really suggest any action on existing illegals except closing the borders in both directions.

Would you happen to have a link to any of these recommendations by them? I've poked around their site, but didn't see anything where they simply advocated border security as a stand-alone measure. If, as you say, they've been trying to get it enacted, then the first thing they'd need to do is make it clear that whatever the merits or demerits of particular legalization plans, they can not be on the table until the border is secured first. If there's anything in their publications that promote such a view, then I'd definitely be willing to revise my views of them. Otherwise, I'd find it hard to believe that they're serious.

125 posted on 05/03/2006 8:02:30 PM PDT by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Castro and Chavez are not constrained by democracy or the rule of law to conceal their Marxism. They admit it, and in fact are in positions where they can allow full blown Marxism to infect their societies. So we don’t have to sit here and think, gosh they’re not Marxist but they sure do act like it. With those guys there’s no doubt.

Understandably, a Marxist Jimmy Carter or a Marxist Bill Clinton would by necessity conceal their Marxism. They would not want people to remember any marching they did in Moscow in the 60’s. Marxism is a system which, due to its inherent weakness, can only take hold via deception and/or coercion. The tough part is that the deception is often internal to the individual. This leads to the abandonment of the label “Marxist” or “communist” even as Marxist ideas are valued and put into practice. The curse of cultural Marxism.


126 posted on 05/04/2006 4:16:52 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Leftists will never stand up like men and fight for their true beliefs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Thanks for the informative reply.


127 posted on 05/04/2006 6:05:37 AM PDT by subterfuge (Call me a Jingoist, I don't care...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

You are very welcome re: post 86.

That was just what I knew to be false off the top of my head and could confirm before posted.

The entire article is full of similar half-truths used to connect dots that just don't connect.


128 posted on 05/04/2006 7:04:56 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: inquest
>>Would you happen to have a link to any of these recommendations by them? I've poked around their site, but didn't see anything where they simply advocated border security as a stand-alone measure.<<

This is the (I believe) most updated version. It is also the plan that is frequently misrepresented as the CFR calling for open borders and the end to national sovereignty because they use scary terms like Trinational and north American community. What they are asking for if you read it through it is an electronic ID system in cooperation with Canada and Mexico that would prevent passage into or out of all three countries or between any two countries without this updated electronic ID. Its beyond anything anybody else is asking for. If anything its scary border security not lax border security. because it would control American citizens leaving the country.

When I get back from lunch I'll find the homeland security document in question the (just the U.S. part) of the same basic plan. Trinational Call for a North American Economic and Security Community by 2010

129 posted on 05/04/2006 10:41:43 AM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

And Venona, no matter what kind of guy McCarthy was, vindicates his charges that commies occupied the Whitehouse, which Alger Hiss did, who also stood beside FDR when they fed Poland live to Stalin.

As for the CFR, they are largely progressive, in bed with big biz, and have put their members in office almost 100% of the time, ex-RWR, since WWII - both the presidencies and the cabinet as all of Ronnie's were, and I'd bet a C-note that he was counseled to select who he did for his cabinet, or he would have vetoed even more Dem legislation.

Their membership has doubled to 4000 in ten years.


130 posted on 05/04/2006 11:29:25 AM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Looking over your link, it doesn't appear that they're calling for an actual increase in the Border Patrol. It seems as though the electronic ID system you're referring to would pretty much only be applied to people who are inclined to follow the law to begin with. And I agree with you, that's a bit disconcerting. Where I disagree is with your assessment of the influence they're having. We're steadily moving in the direction of what they describe in that link.

I also disagree with your assessment that this doesn't represent an plan for amalgamating our three countries. It very much looks like that, and that's also disconcerting on a number of levels. It's not just words like "community" and "trinational". The actual proposals mentioned involve a significant integration of the continent. This is exactly how the EU got started.

131 posted on 05/04/2006 2:40:57 PM PDT by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

Reagan was the real McCoy. He never sold out. Any association between Reagan and the CFR serves history primarily in that it makes the CFR look better.

We would prefer to reveal once and for all the malicious actors within our government and expose their wicked deeds, but the bad guys are making it difficult so we will have to continue our present methods of thwarting their anti-American plans.


132 posted on 05/04/2006 5:54:01 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Leftists will never stand up like men and fight for their true beliefs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
He saw first hand the deception and corruption in the unions and among the Hollywood commies he worked with as pres of SAG. I cried like a baby watching his procession. For me now, Coburn is the next best thing.

But I am not sure he was very up on the CFR & NE industrialist and banking elites even though he was very devoted to Hayek's economics for his earlier correct warning of Europe's statism turning totalitarian just as he predicted. For if he had, one might wonder why almost his whole cabinet was CFR, (who now backs Biden in '08).

Why do so many here that profess patriotism, defend statism and all it's egregious accoutrement's? When was it these brainchilds learned to see Govt as some kind of Samaritan the Founders never did or ever would?
133 posted on 05/05/2006 9:34:19 AM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

So Barry Goldwater is an idiot then?


134 posted on 05/05/2006 9:45:33 AM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites
>>So Barry Goldwater is an idiot then?<<

That could have been a legitimate question if you had not distorted what I said. I didn't call anyone an idiot much less Barry Goldwater.

Barry Goldwater was concerned about the CFR. I understand the Senator's concerns - he was fighting the cold war and the Republican had over-reached with the McCarthy hearings - then you get a couple of elections where both nominees were members of this group.

But Goldwater's concerns were overstated. He was opposing international cooperation and thus lots of people, not just the CFR had criticisms. :like Ronald Reagan, Goldwater was not ready to be President in 1968.

But again, I have criticisms of the CFR too - I'm not suggesting we follow their advice but only that we stop blaming them for everything so we can look at real causes.

135 posted on 05/05/2006 10:39:01 AM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Nope. They are the heart and center of all unlimited Govt that they, and those that created them for their own selfish interests against the people, have pushed for for nearly 100years.

You should google up a few of the many sites that name names and show so many connections with the hard left and even our enemies.

This is an organization the Progressives created to propagandize their own agenda with under the cover of a seemingly innocuous think tank.

Did you see Declassified on History re: WWI last night?

If you don't think the CFR is just another brick in the long incremental institutionalization of the progressive/collectivist agenda wall, you have another thing coming.

Really, read up at mises.org about banking, currency, statism/collectivism, the New Deal, the Progressive era and our constitution of liberty they endeavor so hard to return to us in the ideas freedom.

And the posted article bears more than cursory a reading.


136 posted on 05/05/2006 11:18:29 AM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

PS - there was no over-reaching - only lies from the commies and Rats and obfuscation from their fellow travelers.

No wonder McCarthy was so exasperated, every commie loving Rat piled on him. Only decades of media & academe cooperation demonizing him lead you to say so.

The pri@k that told him "Sir, have you no decency?!" should be tarred, feathered & hung, a regular latter day Clooney he was. I spit in his face.


137 posted on 05/05/2006 11:24:54 AM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

>>Nope. They are the heart and center of all unlimited Govt that they, and those that created them for their own selfish interests against the people, have pushed for for nearly 100years.<<

If there are in fact other forces pushing toward collectivism, then blaming a small group of Americans and saying that is the end of the problem actually distracts from looking at the broader picture....


138 posted on 05/05/2006 11:25:34 AM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

OK, they are the heart of the progressive movement back to it's very beginnings, which agemda was the direct copying of the policies of the euro-dictators whose powers they envied. Get it?

We copied the very policies that brought rise to the euro-dictators and which Hayek warned the world of to no avail. Exactly why Keynes found favor here after the Brits sh@tcanned him, which allowed their economy to revive while we languished under FDR's interventionist Keynesianism for the whole decade, and still do from the unconstitutional behemoth he helped create.

The non-public educrat and true revisons of history are underway.

All the hugest and worst trusts help fund the CFR. Why should they conscience even ONE Marxist among them? No real Americans would.


139 posted on 05/05/2006 11:46:17 AM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

You gotta watch this folks!

http://prisonplanet.com/video/alex_arrested.WMV


140 posted on 05/05/2006 11:52:42 AM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson