Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The CFR and the Trilateral Commission - The two organizations that run the United States
unknown | Melvin Sickler

Posted on 05/02/2006 11:55:13 AM PDT by Marxbites

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-207 next last
To: gondramB

The “real Marxists” I’ve known have been against private ownership, religion, etc. and advocated an all powerful centralized government. But central to their personalities, it always seems, is the tendency to violate their own principles in order to gain some form of social dominance over others. Give any Marxist access to real power, and he will transform into a demagogue with leftist tendencies.


121 posted on 05/03/2006 6:55:15 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Leftists will never stand up like men and fight for their true beliefs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Yep, Castro, Chavez etc...


122 posted on 05/03/2006 7:01:46 PM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
The CFR has been trying for 6 years to get tough border security passed.

Have they been insisting on a border-security-only bill, or have they, like the President, been demanding a "comprehensive reform" that legalizes illegals here in some way, shape, or form? If the latter, then they'd have to know that that's the whole sticking point that's preventing any progress. See tagline.

123 posted on 05/03/2006 7:24:30 PM PDT by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: inquest
>>Have they been insisting on a border-security-only bill, or have they, like the President, been demanding a "comprehensive reform" that legalizes illegals here in some way, shape, or form? If the latter, then they'd have to know that that's the whole sticking point that's preventing any progress. See tagline.<<

I don't know whether their approach on illegals is better or worse than the President's but their approach comes up way short - they don't really suggest any action on existing illegals except closing the borders in both directions.

I'm not saying the CFR is always doing the right thing but rather that many of the harshest criticisms of the CFR are off base.
124 posted on 05/03/2006 7:33:49 PM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
they don't really suggest any action on existing illegals except closing the borders in both directions.

Would you happen to have a link to any of these recommendations by them? I've poked around their site, but didn't see anything where they simply advocated border security as a stand-alone measure. If, as you say, they've been trying to get it enacted, then the first thing they'd need to do is make it clear that whatever the merits or demerits of particular legalization plans, they can not be on the table until the border is secured first. If there's anything in their publications that promote such a view, then I'd definitely be willing to revise my views of them. Otherwise, I'd find it hard to believe that they're serious.

125 posted on 05/03/2006 8:02:30 PM PDT by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Castro and Chavez are not constrained by democracy or the rule of law to conceal their Marxism. They admit it, and in fact are in positions where they can allow full blown Marxism to infect their societies. So we don’t have to sit here and think, gosh they’re not Marxist but they sure do act like it. With those guys there’s no doubt.

Understandably, a Marxist Jimmy Carter or a Marxist Bill Clinton would by necessity conceal their Marxism. They would not want people to remember any marching they did in Moscow in the 60’s. Marxism is a system which, due to its inherent weakness, can only take hold via deception and/or coercion. The tough part is that the deception is often internal to the individual. This leads to the abandonment of the label “Marxist” or “communist” even as Marxist ideas are valued and put into practice. The curse of cultural Marxism.


126 posted on 05/04/2006 4:16:52 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Leftists will never stand up like men and fight for their true beliefs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Thanks for the informative reply.


127 posted on 05/04/2006 6:05:37 AM PDT by subterfuge (Call me a Jingoist, I don't care...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

You are very welcome re: post 86.

That was just what I knew to be false off the top of my head and could confirm before posted.

The entire article is full of similar half-truths used to connect dots that just don't connect.


128 posted on 05/04/2006 7:04:56 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: inquest
>>Would you happen to have a link to any of these recommendations by them? I've poked around their site, but didn't see anything where they simply advocated border security as a stand-alone measure.<<

This is the (I believe) most updated version. It is also the plan that is frequently misrepresented as the CFR calling for open borders and the end to national sovereignty because they use scary terms like Trinational and north American community. What they are asking for if you read it through it is an electronic ID system in cooperation with Canada and Mexico that would prevent passage into or out of all three countries or between any two countries without this updated electronic ID. Its beyond anything anybody else is asking for. If anything its scary border security not lax border security. because it would control American citizens leaving the country.

When I get back from lunch I'll find the homeland security document in question the (just the U.S. part) of the same basic plan. Trinational Call for a North American Economic and Security Community by 2010

129 posted on 05/04/2006 10:41:43 AM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

And Venona, no matter what kind of guy McCarthy was, vindicates his charges that commies occupied the Whitehouse, which Alger Hiss did, who also stood beside FDR when they fed Poland live to Stalin.

As for the CFR, they are largely progressive, in bed with big biz, and have put their members in office almost 100% of the time, ex-RWR, since WWII - both the presidencies and the cabinet as all of Ronnie's were, and I'd bet a C-note that he was counseled to select who he did for his cabinet, or he would have vetoed even more Dem legislation.

Their membership has doubled to 4000 in ten years.


130 posted on 05/04/2006 11:29:25 AM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Looking over your link, it doesn't appear that they're calling for an actual increase in the Border Patrol. It seems as though the electronic ID system you're referring to would pretty much only be applied to people who are inclined to follow the law to begin with. And I agree with you, that's a bit disconcerting. Where I disagree is with your assessment of the influence they're having. We're steadily moving in the direction of what they describe in that link.

I also disagree with your assessment that this doesn't represent an plan for amalgamating our three countries. It very much looks like that, and that's also disconcerting on a number of levels. It's not just words like "community" and "trinational". The actual proposals mentioned involve a significant integration of the continent. This is exactly how the EU got started.

131 posted on 05/04/2006 2:40:57 PM PDT by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

Reagan was the real McCoy. He never sold out. Any association between Reagan and the CFR serves history primarily in that it makes the CFR look better.

We would prefer to reveal once and for all the malicious actors within our government and expose their wicked deeds, but the bad guys are making it difficult so we will have to continue our present methods of thwarting their anti-American plans.


132 posted on 05/04/2006 5:54:01 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Leftists will never stand up like men and fight for their true beliefs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
He saw first hand the deception and corruption in the unions and among the Hollywood commies he worked with as pres of SAG. I cried like a baby watching his procession. For me now, Coburn is the next best thing.

But I am not sure he was very up on the CFR & NE industrialist and banking elites even though he was very devoted to Hayek's economics for his earlier correct warning of Europe's statism turning totalitarian just as he predicted. For if he had, one might wonder why almost his whole cabinet was CFR, (who now backs Biden in '08).

Why do so many here that profess patriotism, defend statism and all it's egregious accoutrement's? When was it these brainchilds learned to see Govt as some kind of Samaritan the Founders never did or ever would?
133 posted on 05/05/2006 9:34:19 AM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

So Barry Goldwater is an idiot then?


134 posted on 05/05/2006 9:45:33 AM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites
>>So Barry Goldwater is an idiot then?<<

That could have been a legitimate question if you had not distorted what I said. I didn't call anyone an idiot much less Barry Goldwater.

Barry Goldwater was concerned about the CFR. I understand the Senator's concerns - he was fighting the cold war and the Republican had over-reached with the McCarthy hearings - then you get a couple of elections where both nominees were members of this group.

But Goldwater's concerns were overstated. He was opposing international cooperation and thus lots of people, not just the CFR had criticisms. :like Ronald Reagan, Goldwater was not ready to be President in 1968.

But again, I have criticisms of the CFR too - I'm not suggesting we follow their advice but only that we stop blaming them for everything so we can look at real causes.

135 posted on 05/05/2006 10:39:01 AM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Nope. They are the heart and center of all unlimited Govt that they, and those that created them for their own selfish interests against the people, have pushed for for nearly 100years.

You should google up a few of the many sites that name names and show so many connections with the hard left and even our enemies.

This is an organization the Progressives created to propagandize their own agenda with under the cover of a seemingly innocuous think tank.

Did you see Declassified on History re: WWI last night?

If you don't think the CFR is just another brick in the long incremental institutionalization of the progressive/collectivist agenda wall, you have another thing coming.

Really, read up at mises.org about banking, currency, statism/collectivism, the New Deal, the Progressive era and our constitution of liberty they endeavor so hard to return to us in the ideas freedom.

And the posted article bears more than cursory a reading.


136 posted on 05/05/2006 11:18:29 AM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

PS - there was no over-reaching - only lies from the commies and Rats and obfuscation from their fellow travelers.

No wonder McCarthy was so exasperated, every commie loving Rat piled on him. Only decades of media & academe cooperation demonizing him lead you to say so.

The pri@k that told him "Sir, have you no decency?!" should be tarred, feathered & hung, a regular latter day Clooney he was. I spit in his face.


137 posted on 05/05/2006 11:24:54 AM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

>>Nope. They are the heart and center of all unlimited Govt that they, and those that created them for their own selfish interests against the people, have pushed for for nearly 100years.<<

If there are in fact other forces pushing toward collectivism, then blaming a small group of Americans and saying that is the end of the problem actually distracts from looking at the broader picture....


138 posted on 05/05/2006 11:25:34 AM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

OK, they are the heart of the progressive movement back to it's very beginnings, which agemda was the direct copying of the policies of the euro-dictators whose powers they envied. Get it?

We copied the very policies that brought rise to the euro-dictators and which Hayek warned the world of to no avail. Exactly why Keynes found favor here after the Brits sh@tcanned him, which allowed their economy to revive while we languished under FDR's interventionist Keynesianism for the whole decade, and still do from the unconstitutional behemoth he helped create.

The non-public educrat and true revisons of history are underway.

All the hugest and worst trusts help fund the CFR. Why should they conscience even ONE Marxist among them? No real Americans would.


139 posted on 05/05/2006 11:46:17 AM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

You gotta watch this folks!

http://prisonplanet.com/video/alex_arrested.WMV


140 posted on 05/05/2006 11:52:42 AM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson