Only incorrect in that statement in a vacuum without the context of the thread GE linked to. GE knew the context, yet he still claimed you lied -- standard tactics. Stating without context that you can't get "dual desktops" without 3rd party tools on Windows is an incorrect statement, since it doesn't have the clarification omitting dual virtual desktops.
I think we're misunderstanding each other a bit. My original statement didn't mention virtual desktops at all. What I was saying was that MS didn't provide for the ability of running dual desktops. That is, each physical screen is a separate entity from the other. They would have different taskbar, tray, and "start" button that are independent of each other.
Regardless, it's a pointless bit to argue over in any case. The only reason I even bothered was for the benefit of the non-trolls on the thread. I couldn't care less what the troll writes or thinks, as it's sole purpose is to disrupt threads.