Fine.... Have the legislature pass a law that says the physicians have input. Have the legislature pass a law stating that the judge can play a role. Have the legislature pass a law stating that the family plays a role.
It's not just a question of who plays a role. It's also a question of why they play a role. Currently, the judge simply decides what he thinks is right, even though there is no law that authorizes him to do that. He might think that the physicians have the best input, or he might think that the family does. He might think that the spouse speaks for the family, or he might think that the parents do. They are making it up as they go along, and that is why there is such an uproar over this. If the legislature passed a law telling the courts what to do, then we would not be having this problem, except of course, if the courts simply refused to honor it.
But we aren't there yet, because the legislature won't do its job in the first place.
I don't understand what you're talking about.
The legislature DID its job with the Futile Care Law. Physicians and hospitals are able to decide when a hospital may remove life support, over the objections of a family, with a ten-day notice.
Now, you might think that ought to be 15 days, or 20 days, or more. But this law places the decision in the hands of the doctors and hospitals, and no judges are involved.