I think the allegations about her being sodomized with a broomhandle came from Kim Roberts, and not from the AV.
Her father has also made the broom allegations.
The whole broomhandle thing came from Mangum's father who picked up on it from Kim Roberts. The old man hears this and that that conflicts with his daughter's story, then he hears this or that and revises that to fill in the flaws in the case. No DNA? He said they used condoms. Then Kim is in the media running her mouth about everything that night, the old man hears it, and then puts out the broomstick claim. Next thing is we hear Wendy Murphy repeating it.
Kim never even said there was a broom. She said it was suggested when the women answered no to the guys' question as to whether or not they'd brought any sex toys. The whole thing with the broom started with Kim saying it was suggested (did not say there even was a broom), then the father picked it up to explain away no DNA, then the lawyers screaming on behalf of Mangum carried it from there. There is nothing in the police media report or the search warrant documents to suggest a broom was used. Yet the father said the other day that his daughter said a broom was used and then she was forced to orally copulate all three of them. Would a guy who just viciously brutalized a woman with a broom then put his organ into her mouth for her to clamp her teeth down on?