The accuser was in high school when she met the man, McNeil said.
If he was at least seven years older the she would have been 10 or eleven at the time, at best.
___________________________________________________
No, no, no, you are misreading what McNeil said. The ACCUSER, ie the woman was in high school when she met the man. It is looking more and more like she claimed rape to her fiancee, if not the police, when she was 16 years old and in high school. This is a different rape claim than she made in 1996 claiming she was raped in 1993.
The next bombshell will be if she claimed rape at age 16 to some authority, the police, someone at her high school etc. To me this is what the defense demand for information was seeking.
I did read it wrong, thanks the correction.