1 posted on
04/25/2006 8:22:28 AM PDT by
GMMAC
To: fanfan; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; Ryle; ...
Also note article's reference to satanic 'Goth' culture.
PING!
2 posted on
04/25/2006 8:25:12 AM PDT by
GMMAC
(Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
To: GMMAC
"...process the tragedy..."
Never heard that phrase before.
RIP, those who were murdered.
To: GMMAC
how tragic!
a very similar local situation was reported just last night.
a 12 yr old boy killed his mother and younger brother.
6 posted on
04/25/2006 8:29:09 AM PDT by
leda
(Dream a better dream and work to make it reality!)
To: GMMAC
A 23-year-old man is also accused in the three deaths. His relationship to the 12-year-old co-accused is unclear.
No....it's really not.
7 posted on
04/25/2006 8:35:52 AM PDT by
trubluolyguy
(It wasn't the spikes that kept Him on the cross.)
To: GMMAC
Let me guess, another "Myspayce" hookup?
8 posted on
04/25/2006 8:37:00 AM PDT by
VOATNOW1
To: GMMAC
If you watch much court tv you'll find that in the Utopian Republic of Canuckistan the max you can get for your most henious multiple or serial murder conviction is 25 years in country club comfort. Hell these two will have plenty of time after they get out to get back together and move next door in sunny Dania Beach Florida and while still living off the Canuckee dole.
11 posted on
04/25/2006 8:46:17 AM PDT by
Calusa
(I believe above the storm, The smallest Prayer will still be heard.)
To: GMMAC
I went to junior high, so I'm not surprised that a 12-year-old would be capable of cold-blooded murder.
13 posted on
04/25/2006 8:53:56 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
To: GMMAC
"The 23-year-old man claimed to work in the government or military.
A friend of the 12-year-old said she met the older man over the Internet, but police would not comment on their relationship."
What do you want to bet that they were "seeing" each other, the parents objected (what parents wouldn't?) and they killed the parents?
16 posted on
04/25/2006 9:17:50 AM PDT by
fredhead
(The greatest privilege of citizenship is to be able to freely bear arms under one's country's flag.)
To: GMMAC
Police...did say there was evidence of foul play. Canadian Sherlocks.
To: GMMAC
His relationship to the 12-year-old co-accused is unclearI'm guess ing the murders were in response to the family's vehement objections to his "unclear relationship" with the girl.
21 posted on
04/25/2006 10:50:26 AM PDT by
ApplegateRanch
(Mohamophages of the world, unite! "Offended by offended Muslims since 9-11")
To: GMMAC
To: GMMAC
Not naming the victims of crime is going too far, especially as it is designed to protect the offender.
24 posted on
04/25/2006 3:13:56 PM PDT by
Fair Go
To: GMMAC
Sounds like an episode from CSI.
25 posted on
04/25/2006 3:16:57 PM PDT by
mware
(Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
To: GMMAC
What would drive someone so young to do something like that?
To: GMMAC
Police wouldn't say if the home was ransacked or what weapons may have been used, but did say there was evidence of foul play.I would think that three dead bodies would be considered evidence of foul play.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson