Additionally, J. Kirk Osborn, who represents 20-year-old Reade Seligmann, surmises that there is a "good chance" that the accuser "may have been committed, at least once, to a hospital or drug treatment program." As such, Osborn wants material documenting the woman's supposed "drug abuse history," according to a discovery motion filed this afternoon in Durham's Superior Court. The motion, a copy of which you'll find below, also seeks the 27-year-old dancer's criminal history, probation, and education records. The material sought, Osborn argues, provides "rich sources of information for impeaching the complaining witness." 
Here is this case in a nutshell:
1. Some college boys drinking one night call an escort service for some strippers to perform.
2. Two strippers show up, and one of them is drunk out of her mind, and the other one is full of anger and attitude. They perform for 4 minutes.
3. The college boys are ticked off, and demand their money back.
4. Racial slurs are thrown on both sides, a heated argument ensues.
5. The strippers leave, and the semi-sober stripper attempts to dump the passed out stripper at a Kroeger supermarket parking lot. Meanwhile, the second stripper makes a phoney 911 call saying she and her "girlfriend" were just walking buy a house and were called "_iggers."
6. The drunk stripper wakes up and yells rape, while the second stripper (who may or may have not taken her share of the $800 while she was passed out) e-mails a PR firm and asks for help on how she can profit from this.
You seem to know a lot ~ question, if the fellow(s) who hired the escort company to send strippers paid the escort company, did the escort service pay the strippers before they stripped?
Does anyone really want any of us to believe that in this racket the actors get paid first?