Posted on 04/24/2006 12:30:28 PM PDT by OXENinFLA
Now that I've had time to think about last night's episode I have a few random thoughts...
-Why the heck did Jack go through so much trouble to get that recording and then casually pass it off to Chloe, leave her unguarded in an unlocked room and then go make out with Audrey's knee?!!!!!
-speaking of kissing her knee, I thought her arm had the booboo. Should he have kiss her arm and made her booboo go away?
-As great as Gregory Itzin's acting is, I'm getting tired of these Logan/Graham centric episodes. Graham is annoying.
-I've been thinking that the nerve gas threat ended a few weeks to early. It seems like these last 6 episodes could be have compressed into 2-3 episodes. 24 is more exciting when there's the threat of a major attack on civilians. Bierko's return should solve that problem though
-I really wish that the nerve gas attack on CTU had occured much later in the season. Oh well.
-I want to see Chloe torture Miles!!!!
I'm catching up on this thread today (can't participate in real time because 24 plays an hour later in MDT), and you win the prize for the funniest post (so far)!
Here's another fun article on Mary Lynn. She seems like one of the most normal people in Hollywood.
http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/magazine/daily/14532412.htm
My personal preference was when he went for Walt Cunningham's eyes with a knife. I had no doubt he'd have done it!
Cool! Gilmore Girls is another of my favorite shows. Thanks for telling us.
I have no clue if we're going to see Kim again or not.
I will never, ever post anything that I know to be a spoiler.
I dont think the standard is whether or not YOU think it is a spoiler. Spreading around this info about signing contracts, etc. ... is info outside the show and something that a number of us on this thread DO NOT WANT to know about because we enjoy the show itself --within the 4 corners of the show, and dont want the info OUTSIDE THE SHOW.
You may have accepted the request that you not do this, but it did seem you were leaving yourself the out that you would continue to share [post] this extraneous type of info, so long as you are not sure whether it indicates the future turn of the plot. Thanks for your consideration.
However, you're not going to win so give it up.
If you don't like what I have to say, don't read it.
And like the last person who tried to troll me out of the thread, I won't respond to you anymore so do yourself a favor and don't waste your time trying.
I agree, don't bother, ontos-on. I'm the "last person who tried to troll him out".
Of course, I didn't b*tch, I'm not a troll, and I didn't try to get him out, just asked him to wait until 10:01pm to post his spoilers.
Now I see I'm being accused falsely of something -- and without even the courtesy of the mandatory ping.
You're welcome:)
Her quirkiness is part of her charm. I've been really impressed by Mary Lynn in her interviews. She seems really smart and she's hillarious.
My local cable company doesn't have the WB but they air some of the shows starting 10:00 on another channel.
Mary Lynn was wearing a really wacky outfit on the show, but she actually wasn't that bad of a singer. She was in tune. And did I mention her outfit was hideous? Haha. She's great.
Well, it does take all kinds.
Then don't follow a fan thread about the show! Just watch the show.
Anyone can agree to not post spoilers as to plot before air time. Being on the west coast, I have to avoid the thread completely monday evening till it's long over for everyone else.
But it's the nature of the show, and threads like this, to speculate and find tidbits and details about the characters, actors and the show. Your complaint is ridiculous, in my humble opinion, and the limitations you want to put on the thread are preposterous.
I was LMAO!
My complant was specifically the posting of the news as to the Kim character having signed a contract for "x" number of episodes. I feel that this scotches real speculation and creative imagination by those who actually have a sense of the spirit of the show and would like to consider various options and likelihoods of future plot twists. That's all.
I realize that logic chopping needs straw men, but it aint me. There did not need to be a "him or me" reaction to my attempt reasonably and directly to the person involved, to persuade him to not do that particular thing in the future. [The response was crude and along the line of "your bitching at me and I can ignore you, and you want to ban me from the thread." That was an absurd response and not at all what was diirected at him. ] I valued some of his input and the way that he had appeared to internalize so much of the history of the different episodes--even through different seasons.
I can recognize that some people take any critique, however constructive, to be an attack against which their ego has to fire all guns in order to resist it. When a person reveals himself to be of that caliber, there is no use to continue the discussion. Well, that's all I need to say.
I know, and it's petty. So what? Doesn't say what she's going to DO. It's a statement that might have been found in any interview with the actor... I remember a similar detail being revealed about Sean Astin in an interview. It still doesn't give anything away as to plot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.