Even the craziest liberal at the Washington Post knows that military life is not for the spoiled.
"Lost fake fingernails in the bathroom suggest a fight. The lack of any DNA material under those nails suggests she never fought back."
I heard that photos show she was missing fingernails when she arrived at the party?
Washington Post is just irked, they want to pick the facts for us.
I must have missed this justice system "trial". When did it occur?
She graduated from Stanford Law School in 1996 (though she started Stanford in 1992), and even wrote an article "Supreme Court Beings and Other Myths" for her alumni magazine, where she talks about her philosophy of judicial coverage. While in law school, she was apparently active enough in the Jewish Law Student's Association such that she was mentioned in a national law student newsletter
Dahlia is a Canadian that lived in Israel for 3 Years.
Lithwick is Canadian in origin; despite living in the United States she remains a Canadian citizen to this day.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dahlia_Lithwick
She is a regular guest on The Al Franken Show
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dahlia_Lithwick
At Durham, just pick your suspects.
Professor Hill apparently never heard of a little thing called a Statute of Limitations.
In the spirit of "one good ad hominem deserves another", I would say that this article serves as yet another depressing reminder of all that is wrong with Dahlia Lithwick. Clearly her deranged screed is emblematic of the mental illness shared by all loathsome leftist harridans.
Note that calling names may feel very satisfying (how does it feel to be the target, Dahlia?), but it illuminates nothing about the substance of the issue. That such childishness seems to be just fine with the editors of the Washington Post is ultimately the most revealing thing about the article.