To: LK44-40
I think that she was drugged at the LAX house, maybe then messed with a bit sexually or taunted sexually and racially, maybe slapped, but much less than charged.Basically you don't believe the AV or any of the witnesses. Your theory comes from...?
To: ladyjane
"I think that she was drugged at the LAX house, maybe then messed with a bit sexually or taunted sexually and racially, maybe slapped, but much less than charged.
Basically you don't believe the AV or any of the witnesses.
Your theory comes from...?"
LK been posting this for about a week. It doesn't jive with either the prosecution's version or the defense version. It only ties to Kim's version, but the AV had on only one shoe very early in the evening--a clear sign she was previously intoxicated.
What I find weird about this case is the insistence among some people that the Duke Lax team just had to commit a serious crime, so far I don't see anything close. Maybe Nifong has something up his sleeve other than his arm, but based on the repeated incompetence he's demonstrated, I doubt it--I mean who wants to look like a buffoon a week before the election?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson