Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attorney: No Plea Deal for Duke Player
abc11TV.com ^ | April 19, 2006

Posted on 04/19/2006 9:33:10 PM PDT by Howlin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last

1 posted on 04/19/2006 9:33:14 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abb; Alia; AntiGuv; AmishDude; Bogeygolfer; BossLady; Brytani; beyondashadow; bwteim; Carling; ...
New DUKE LACROSSE Thread ping!!!!
2 posted on 04/19/2006 9:34:24 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Paging Pamela Mackey....your legal services are needed in Durham, NC.
3 posted on 04/19/2006 9:36:13 PM PDT by defenderSD (¤¤ Wishing, hoping, and praying that Saddam will not nuke us is not a national security policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks for the ping.


4 posted on 04/19/2006 9:36:24 PM PDT by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

She struck me as a heck of a good defense lawyer.


5 posted on 04/19/2006 9:36:46 PM PDT by defenderSD (¤¤ Wishing, hoping, and praying that Saddam will not nuke us is not a national security policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Thank You! There is another Duke thread going too Duke
6 posted on 04/19/2006 9:37:27 PM PDT by Neverforget01 (Proud enemy of the drive-by-media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

Bump for the Bill of Rights and the presumption of innocence for all those accused by the state.


7 posted on 04/19/2006 9:38:49 PM PDT by defenderSD (¤¤ Wishing, hoping, and praying that Saddam will not nuke us is not a national security policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

Yep, she really showed herself to be a great advocate in the Faber v. Bryant cases.


8 posted on 04/19/2006 9:39:28 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

bump to your ping


9 posted on 04/19/2006 9:39:39 PM PDT by Enterprise (The MSM - Propaganda wing and news censorship division of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I stand by what I said long ago about why the stripper cried rape ... didn't get the shakedown raise in price so she howled. Sadly, race relations are now in the toilet in Durham, but hey, the democrat party has their talking point item for manipulating black voters don'tchaknow.


10 posted on 04/19/2006 9:41:44 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
*** QUESTION: This is how the media described the woman cheating on her husband and getting pregnant by another man while married: Along the way, the woman became interested in another sailor, a man who would later father her children... The two separated (her and her husband) as the new relationship began... Six months later, she was discharged from the service. . Now, I ask you, do you think if a man had been unfaithful to his wife and got another woman pregnant while married - does anyone think the Media would've described it like this?
11 posted on 04/19/2006 9:44:07 PM PDT by OakOak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

I jumbled it all up..

*** QUESTION:

This is how the media described the woman cheating on her husband and getting pregnant by another man while married:

Along the way, the woman became interested in another sailor, a man who would later father her children... The two separated (her and her husband) as the new relationship began... Six months later, she was discharged from the service. .

Now, I ASK YOU, do you think if a man had been unfaithful to his wife and got another woman pregnant while married - does anyone think the Media would've described it like this?

They almost make it sound 'romantic'
.


12 posted on 04/19/2006 9:46:48 PM PDT by OakOak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OakOak

Apparently...NOTHING is her fault...it all just happened TO her.....ugh!!!!


13 posted on 04/19/2006 9:47:59 PM PDT by BossLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OakOak

Democrat or Republican, because there is a double standard by which the BM crucifies or mollifies people.


14 posted on 04/19/2006 9:48:33 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Lawyers almost never speak in such a direct way about a case. It has to be a slam dunk.


15 posted on 04/19/2006 9:49:01 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OakOak

Crystal is a slut. There is no nice way to put it.


16 posted on 04/19/2006 9:49:49 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Neverforget01

Frankly, I'm happy back here, away from the whackos and people who get on threads like these to work out their personal issues.....


:-)


17 posted on 04/19/2006 9:50:01 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BossLady

This is Scott Peterson in REVERSE.

Peterson had an affair while his wife was pregnant.

Justifiably, he was the scum of the earth. Nancy Grace wrote an e-mail saying she was going to invite Scott over and skin him, I'm told.

But, this woman. You can just feel for her. She was in love and what could she do. No judgement whatsoever.

.


18 posted on 04/19/2006 9:51:03 PM PDT by OakOak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

Yep, ones first reaction to these attorney is boy are they going out on a limb. But when the DNA came back, I figured they knew what they were talking about. I bet they had the team all take polygraphs?


19 posted on 04/19/2006 9:51:06 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

And they've been talking like this all along.

As I have said before, in all my years, I've never seen attorneys are furious as these guys are; so much so that the attorneys for the players who are not indicted are now going to work on behalf of these two boys.

It's going to be a bloodbath -- and I have no doubt who is going to be left standing.


20 posted on 04/19/2006 9:51:27 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson