I am still disturbed that the DA would redo DNA test.
____________________________________________
Why I believe I heard on some media outlet that the second set of DNA tests are the DNA associated with hair, regular and pubic, found on her person. That explains a second set of test if not a DA so low that he would smear someone for the sake of his reelection.
Why not test it all the first time? And why go to a second lab? And if the state labs work is so bad what does that say about all the convictions they have gotten with results from that same lab?