Posted on 04/19/2006 4:37:00 AM PDT by MindBender26
I don't know how NC law works in that particular area, but in Cali, they would have the right to ask for a lawyer present or decline to answer question. At that point the DA would have to offer immunity or move on.
Remember Ollie North, and that era?
Just how much is that tuition at Duke....seems like another advanced degree could be an attractive proposition.....might be a cheap preventative medicinal formulat...a hummer a day...keep the undertaker away!!!
I don't believe that has to be the case. I may be wrong, but can't a judge simply dismiss the charges at any time? I know the DA can, though this one probably won't, regardless of the evidence.
It's called plausible deniability. If he didn't see any evidence that the accused was not guilty then he can claim he went forward with the indictments in good faith.
The guys claimed the strippers locked themselves in the bathroom for 10-20 minutes.
Here's the AV's account:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0329061duke4.html
"I do have faith in the system."
I'm sorry, but one of the most disturbing aspects of this is the reaction of the black community--which seems to have already made a presumption of guilt.
When I remember the
1)Brawley fiasco,
2)the Rosenberg (?) case
(in which a Hassidic Jew was murdered by a black male who was identified by the victim before he died, and found with the blood-stained knife on his person)--where the accused was aquited by a black jury which then went and held a party with the defense attorneys
3)the murder of Meir Kahane in front of 60+ witnesses
(aquitted by a black jury)
4) OJ
I think I would be terrified to be tried by a black jury.
Which is more than Nifong has or deserves.
I'll keep repeating this, but Nifong needs Mangum to be discredited for this to go away.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1616934/posts?page=1370#1370
thanks! - I appreciate your legal expertise. I don't see Nifong offering immunity to anyone so maybe that is why he stopped asking the players about their whereabouts with their attorneys present - he knew they would just refuse to answer.
Wouldn't it still be standard procedure for law enforcement to ask each of the potential suspects where they were that night?
A house call in the dorm? Please tell me you're joking.
I see you have nothing to add to the time-line defense except speculation. Thanks anyways.
I'm afraid there's too much pressure from "the community", and this thing has taken on a life of its own.
With all due respect to LocomotiveBreath:
Old Charlie stole the handle and
The train won't stop going--
No way to slow down.
No way to slow down
I do too. Lawrence Summers, Harvard, said a thing which has been substantiated by those who do brain research differentiating sex while in mid presentation to a group of academics. The feminists DEMANDED he step down for bringing up those scientific "community" questions and theories concerning "women" and "science"
It was experienced, by the feminist Academics present, that his words were worse than RAPE. They felt ill, they swooned.
The Duke President said things/did things in this situation which showed that he has no brain.
Which state you are in doesn't matter. You always have the right to remain silent.
The most recent game was on Saturday 11 March.
"I think I would be terrified to be tried by a black jury."
And I'm sorry to say that.
When OJ was accused of murdering his wife (who was white, with flowing long blond hair, to boot), the white community did not erupt. It simply wasn't an issue. Those days are long gone. Race just isn't important.
But to the black community, their victimhood in too many cases is what constitutes their sole identity.
(Case in point--notice the reactions of black juries, and their almost automatic nullification of charges against black defendants--no matter what the evidence shows).
And I'm afraid that all the evidence in the world isn't going to mean much in Durham, or convince the black
citizen/leader/ministers who have already spoken on this case to publicly even admit a possibility that they may have been wrong.
I don't know how long it's been since you were in college but things are very different now. Going back to school might put a strain on your heart!
But that doesn't matter. What matters is that whenever the photo is taken, there is ONLY a 1 in 60 chance the the seconds will land on a random number. If I take a photo at 12:00, the second results will be from :00-59. If I take a photo at 12:10, the results of the seconds will be the same, :00-59. Consecutive minutes don't matter, only the finite 60 possibilities.
I notice that this photo and the preceeding one -- i.e., the first two -- are time-stamped without showing any odd seconds
Hmm, I didn't know that. Interesting. I will say that 60x60 will still yield random results. I'd hate to base my criticisms of the photos on this mathematical point if I was Nifong. Still, if indeed the first two are time-stamped at :00 seconds it is one way the Nifong can attack this evidence.
Hoping a legal type will more substantively clarify this...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.