Abrams: Isn't it a problem she could only ID them a week ago?
Guest: I don't see that as a problem. If the prosecution didn't want to proceed until they had a substantial ID. DA was wise not to rush on this.
Abrams: I still don't know what has changed from the days after this incident; how has she been able to assess who did this to her. This is the poster of the lacrosse team which has all the playesr on it and presumably this was used to ID who was who. WHen I look at that poster, a lot of the players look alike.
Guest: Police were able to seize through the search warrants phones and cameras and computers, there were other photographs used for the ID. We now have an indictment from the GJ. He waited to have that seal of approval from the public. The DA proceeded properly to this point. What's so interesting is that they're oging ahead to find the 3rd person. He's going full steam ahead.
Abrams: I can tell you that the defense team did not discuss iwth the DA, they don't want to discuss many of the details the specifics of the timeline as to how they can be so certain that one of the young men couldn't have been at the party. They don't want to tip off the DA. Susan is saying the DA knew about all this evidence and went ahead otherwise. We don't know that the DA has seen the photographs taken by someone at the party. We haven't seen the warrant executed for that camera. That camera and pictures are in the hands of the defense team.
Guest: If the defense has this kind of evidence, they would have taken this to the DA.
Who was this idiot guest? Sounds like something Wendy Murphy or Nancy Grace would say.
Abrams: Timeline --
1:49 she was transported to Durham Access which provides mental health care.
Arrived at 1:55
2:31 taken to Duke ER
2:50 changed from intoxicated person to rape suspect.
Again, let me inject an awful thought here: Maybe to the accuser, all of them looked alike?