Extraterrestrial UFOs can travel freely violating ... laws of inertia and gravity in the earth

India Daily ^ | 1/15/06 | India Daily Technology Team

[NormsRevenge]

The simple common belief that UFOs propagate with anti-gravity lift and “known gyroscopic” principles is not correct. That is what may have misguided country after country as they have tried to mimic UFO propulsion and navigation.

What really induced engineers to develop the computer models is that simple anti-gravity lift and propulsion systems were not taking them anywhere. Soon they realized that anti-gravity is the secondary dynamic force. The computer models were showing that the flight trajectories were too flexible for any gyroscope driven just with anti-gravity lift.

The model brought engineers to look into something called “inertia of an ellipsoid”. They soon found that the laws of motion and inertia just does not apply to a “freely” spinning ellipsoid where gravity can be manipulated and simulated. In simple language, the extra-terrestrial UFOs can travel freely violating all the laws of inertia in the earth. That provides them the ability to propagate and disappear instantaneously into the cloud of electromagnetic flux.

The computer models are helping analyze these complex model of dynamics. The models now are showing sign of dynamic forces from other unknown dimensions that cause the complex and totally flexible propagation system. Engineers are slowly realizing how complex these extra-terrestrial UFOs are and how difficult it is to replicate them based on our very limited knowledge of three dimensional or at best four dimensional physics.

[Frank_Discussion]

Thanks, Kevin.

[Frank_Discussion]

"More intelligent than most reported studies by ufology 'physicists'."

I'm trying to to see how that is a true statement. It depends what you are talking about in the Ufology milieu. Few physicists look at the propulsion power source and methods themselves, though the pop-culture types often speculate without any basis in science.

There have been a few disciplined people who have looked at the issue with rigor, though. Paul Hill comes to mind as the chief example.

[Frank_Discussion]

Let me clarify: The "pop-culture type" would be those without real scientific background, but able to string together a cat's cradle of science jargon, regardless of true scientific connectivity. Bob Lazar, and others.

[Pepper777]

"" Am prayerfully pondering posting the latest Bible Codes Digest.

Is anyone else interested?""

I'm interested, Quix!! Please ping me to your postings. ;)

[Quix]

I don't recall if Stan Friedman did, or not. Do you recall?

[Frank_Discussion]

I don't have an answer for that at the moment. I can ask him though.

[Quix]

Please do ask him and tell him that I very much enjoyed his presentation at the Aztec conference recently.

[Frank_Discussion]

Mornin' Quix.

Here was Stan's reply:

"A few references might be useful. My congressional Testimony at the hearings of July 29, 1968, is somewhere on the Web (Symposium on Unidentified Flying Objects - Hearings before the Committee on Science and astronautics). It is in two parts and includes 65 references, a list of 10 patents for circular aircraft and a copy of an article Flying Saucers ARE Real with more references. The volume has 11 other papers by Hynek, Sagan, McDonald, Menzel, Sprinkle, Harder, etc

My 1974 MUFON paper, Flying Saucers and Physics, is 18 pages, 2 columns and has 69 References. It is still available from me at POB 958, Houlton, ME 04730-0958 USA for $4. which includes shipping.

My 1999 MUFON paper, Star Travel? YES!, is also 18 pages long and has 18 References... also $4. from me.

The above cover a lot of ground, but not much about very
speculative far out propulsion systems. Magnetoaerodynamics, fission, fusion... are all discussed."

[Frank_Discussion]

Symposium on Unidentified Flying Objects - Hearings before the Committee on Science and Astronautics

http://ncas.sawco.com/ufosymposium/