To: ahayes
"Are you expecting us to find DNA millions of years old? If so, may I submit you have no clue what you're talking about?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>...............
finally an evolutionist who gets it..there is NO DNA evidence just gross anatomy of partial fossilized skeletons and from that paltry data why the further back we go 100 200 400 million yrs the more they seem to know about the animals and plants they have stone bits of ...new genus this and new phylum that and new link here and there and why we even know life began 4.5 billion yrs ago give or take a billion..but ask how all this DNA and nucleic acids and proteins and precursors came about and they yell foul we only study other stuff don't cha know.
25 posted on
04/12/2006 1:09:19 PM PDT by
ConsentofGoverned
(if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
To: ConsentofGoverned
Yeah, funny, you'd think if it all got buried just 4,000 years ago in a humongous flood we'd have better data. How come we can get DNA out of mummies a couple thousand years old and then suddenly we can't get anything out of ape fossils only a bit older than that? So confusing!
33 posted on
04/12/2006 1:33:22 PM PDT by
ahayes
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson