I wonder what the state bar ethics rules are about pursuing a case in the absence of evidence, or in the presence of extenuating evidence, and what the rules are about providing pictures of people to her to help her memory.
Witness tampering? Nah, a prosecutor would never coach a witness just to bump up his win percentage, would he?
No need to wonder:
The ABA is very clear about it; he's WAY out of line, including his statements that she WAS raped.
This man will be brought up on ethics charges.
If it was only last week, after the huge media circus erupted, that she first identified anyone, then it need not be the DA's office or the police who coached her - her boyfriend, friends, local race hustlers, anyone - could have shown her pictures identifying the names and faces of the lacrosse team, telling her which ones were captains and which ones were living in the house.