Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Per Slashdot.
1 posted on 04/07/2006 12:34:29 PM PDT by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Senator Bedfellow

Since it's written in assembler, shouldn't this virus be more properly called an "x86 virus" rather than a "Windows virus" or a "Linux virus"?


2 posted on 04/07/2006 12:41:42 PM PDT by Redcloak (WARNING: This post may irritate John McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Senator Bedfellow

I still don't see this as a problem since it only affects executables in your home directory. It would be different if it somehow could run those executables in a chroot or sudo environment. Then I'd be worried.


4 posted on 04/07/2006 12:54:19 PM PDT by BigTex5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Senator Bedfellow

Now that all platforms are essentially running on Intel chips, I would expect virus writers to move to machine code. I'm surprised they haven't already.


6 posted on 04/07/2006 1:05:51 PM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson