[MortMan]

You are acting like nothing more than a class warfare victim, sir. Your argument is illogical - it is based on pure emotion.

Yes, the mother has a right under our legal system to pursue a higher level of support based on his income. But he has the legal right not to pay for services not rendered (the day care).

We actually don't disagree on the moral dimensions here. But your "screw the rich guy" stance, to be honest, is little more than socialism.

Have a good day.

[demkicker]

Wrong on all accounts. First of all, I am a woman. Second of all, my argument is completely logical. If you've got a problem with millionaires having to pay more child support for their children than what lower or upper middle class fathers pay, you need to direct your anger toward the law.

But your "screw the rich guy" stance, to be honest, is little more than socialism.

What a fallacious statement! Am I repulsed at Randy Johnson's behavior? Yes. But I've got news for you. Child support has been paid based on a sliding scale according to income for decades. For you to call that socialism is laughable. And I don't have a screw the rich guy stance. My stance is screw Randy Johnson.