Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration

If you're going to site the bible, I hope you can provide some independent references to support your claims. A book of legends, oft-edited historical accounts and rumor doesn't qualify in a discussion of science.


79 posted on 03/24/2006 2:50:31 PM PST by blowfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: blowfish
If you're going to site the bible, I hope you can provide some independent references to support your claims. A book of legends, oft-edited historical accounts and rumor doesn't qualify in a discussion of science.

Really?

The Bible has shown itself to be accurate on everything it speaks of, both historically and scientifically.

Do you know that the idea of anesthesia came from a scientist reading Genesis and seeing how God put Adam into a deep sleep?

Same with washing of hands to keep infections down.

See Leviticus.

Ofcourse, when these two scientists put forth these discoveries they were attacked and ridiculed by the 'great' scientific communities of their day.

The fool has said in his heart there is no God. (Psa.14:1)

84 posted on 03/24/2006 2:58:04 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson