Oh, come on now!
There is not one so-called 'transitional' skull that can be proved to be a transitional skull.
It is either a human skull or an animal one.
Good! Then you should have no problem with Jenny's test.
Btw, how (in light of your declaration that it MUST be one or the other) would you interpret it -- if it just happened to be the case -- that creationist "experts" could not themselves agree whether a particular skull (or each of a number of fossil skulls) was a "human [one]" or an "animal one"?
FTD will NOT be doing Jenny's test. That would support or refute his or her unsupported statements. And anti-evos do not, unlike everyone else in forum, back up or support their statements.