To: fortheDeclaration
Now,if you want to call humans 'hominids' that is fine, but they fall under a distinct class, which is not an animal.
Are you suggesting that they fall in a different kingdom? I do not see that the classification of "animal" is incorrect. It appears that homonids are vertibrates, and vertibrates are a subset of animals.
73 posted on
03/24/2006 2:45:36 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
Now,if you want to call humans 'hominids' that is fine, but they fall under a distinct class, which is not an animal. Are you suggesting that they fall in a different kingdom? I do not see that the classification of "animal" is incorrect. It appears that homonids are vertibrates, and vertibrates are a subset of animals. Here we go with the playing of terms.
We are talking about a transition from ape to man (correct?) which means from animal to mankind.
So, the transitional species would be a kind of both, now wouldn't he/it?
So the evolutionists are looking for something that is neither completely animal or human.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson