To: fortheDeclaration
Man is not an animal, no matter how much the evolutionists want to make him one.
If this is the case, then into which biological kingdom should homo sapiens be classified?
What justification do you have for rejecting taxonomic classifications established and used in biology?
237 posted on
03/24/2006 6:23:57 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
Incredibly-strange-dormant-troll placemarker.
240 posted on
03/24/2006 6:28:51 PM PST by
balrog666
(Irrational beliefs inspire irrational posts.)
To: Dimensio
If this is the case, then into which biological kingdom should homo sapiens be classified?
I'm pretty sure it depends. If a man is in the sea, he would be classified in the fish kingdom with squids and mantee.
313 posted on
03/24/2006 8:17:52 PM PST by
crail
(Better lives have been lost on the gallows than have ever been enshrined in the halls of palaces.)
To: Dimensio
Well, we have the kingdom Animalia-Except-Humans and the brand spanking new kingdom Humans.
This is weird since when I was growing up (YEC) I was taught that people fell into the category of animals, but we were more than just animals.
351 posted on
03/25/2006 4:22:38 AM PST by
ahayes
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson